this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
231 points (97.1% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2213 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When Benson Wanjala started farming in his western Kenya village two and a half decades ago, his 10-acre farm could produce a bountiful harvest of 200 bags of maize. That has dwindled to 30. He says his once fertile soil has become a nearly lifeless field that no longer earns him a living.

Like many other farmers, he blames acidifying fertilizers pushed in Kenya and other African countries in recent years. He said he started using the fertilizers to boost his yield and it worked — until it didn’t. Kenya’s government first introduced a fertilizer subsidy in 2008, making chemical fertilizers more accessible for smaller-scale farmers.

Problems with soil health are growing as the African continent struggles to feed itself. Africa has 65% of the world’s remaining uncultivated arable land but has spent about $60 billion annually to import food, according to the African Development Bank. The spending is estimated to jump to $110 billion by 2025 due to increased demand and changing consumption habits.

“Inorganic fertilizers were never meant to be the foundation of crop production,” he said, later adding that because of “commercially inclined farming, our soils are now poor, acidic, and low in biomass resources, and without life!”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Bro, how many cobs have you husked by hand? What about cotton balls carded, spun and woven? Grain reaped? I haven't done much of those things, but enough to get that it sucks. And that's not even going into the various things all those educated people in the the city make possible, like medicine so you don't die at 5 from a bacterial infection.

Assuming you're in the US, why do you think illegal immigrants are the ones that work the fields? Unless you're about to reveal you're a rural Indian this is some seriously out of touch Marie Antoinette shit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I think they meant like around population centers to supplant regular food. But I don't know where that would actually be...

My crazy idea is Suburbia has a lot of lawn, and my dad showed me a garden can feed a family more than I would have thought. But who has time to do that? So you nake a law that you forfeit sections of your land, not x feet near your house if they have no existing agricultural or industrial activity for open planting, until at least the next season. Maintained lawns wouldn't exist unless you were somewhere sufficiently rural.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Hopefully, otherwise they're telling the starving African kids to go back to the stone age to save the environment, while they presumably stay somewhere air conditioned. The sad thing is that they probably don't even realise how insulting that is.

Densifying suburbs is a huge thing that needs to happen. It won't change the world, because as big as suburbia is rural areas are bigger, but it will help. It also would do a lot to keep transport emissions down.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This is what I am talking about. You can restore desolate land and make it produce food for humans:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vKAPL_WfBA&t=47s&pp=ygUPYW5kcmV3IG1pbGxpc29u

It's unclear why you are projecting some nonsense about me wanting to keep Africans in the stone age. Maybe try to be a bit more charitable.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You said ~~we should~~ much poorer people than you should go back to the way things were thousands of years ago, including living in the boonies handweeding mixed-use gardens in order to not starve. Maybe you're still letting them use metal tools, but that's kind of a weak improvement. They could do agriculture the same way the people who feed your white-collar ass do, with a bit of education and a leg up, but that's not good enough apparently for your highness. Look, I'm trying to be charitable, but this is so outrageous it's hard.

A quick look through your profile suggests you were recently a banker in California. You should basically shut up about how much baking in the sun people you have nothing to do with need to endure. Until you goddamn try it, at least.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They didn’t say that, you inferred it. Also your take on them not going to school? The fuck? They can definitely do both

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No, mate. I'm close with actual relief workers IRL. ^Albeit^ ^one^ ^less^ ^as^ ^of^ ^a^ ^couple^ ^weeks^ ^ago^ ^:(^

Keeping the kids out of school so they can work the land so you don't starve is common as dirt. It's as simple as a certain number of hours in a day, and school taking a good half of them. Shit, even farming folk here in the West did similar things a century ago.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I really feel that there must be a streak of racism among the people who responded to this thread. It was weird how people took exception to the idea of food being made in a community.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I think there's a streak of racism among Westerners who think they know better than the people on the ground, if we're going there.

In fact, the people who actually show up to help have a nickname for your lot: "Great White Savior"

I don't think you're a bad person. Or a racist. I do think you stepped in shit and are digging yourself deeper out of, like, pride.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nah, man, this is all on you. Talking about what people in Africa, India, and Pakistan are experimenting with in their own country does not make anyone outside of there a white savior. This is really all on you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You didn't just talk about it. You said they should all do it, and specifically shouldn't do standard agriculture, like what you depend on. If they find a use for mixed planting, great, and obviously they do sometimes.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago

We're done. You're toxic, have a block.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

A terrible idea, putting food production in communities and making sure they are fed. I should have known better. You're right, massive agriculture in the hands of a powerful elite is the only answer.