this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
384 points (95.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9573 readers
387 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A pediatric doctor at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia was killed while riding her bike in Center City on Wednesday night.

https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/deadly-3-car-crash-rittenhouse-philadelphia/3915690/

The original post on the Philadelphia subreddit https://www.reddit.com/r/philadelphia/comments/1e5wkv0/insane_accident_on_18th_and_spruce/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 166 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

A pediatric doctor at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia was killed while riding her bike in Center City on Wednesday night.

The use of passive voice in the first sentence does a lot of work shifting blame away from the driver and the car centric systems in an "objective" effort.

How about:

Cyclist Barbara Friedes died when the driver of a car hit her in the bike lane on Wednesday night.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

@apfelwoiSchoppen @ByteOnBikes Active voice would be, “A driver killed…”

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They're both active voice, they just have different verbs.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yep, high school grammar 101. It isn't that journalists don't know this, it is how they are trained. Shift obvious blame away from parties for objectivity until a verdict or deference to the status quo.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Yes, we all agree on that fact. The discussion progressed to two different commentors' active voice re-writes of the original sentence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Both killed and died are active voice.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

@apfelwoiSchoppen But functionally, the victim didn’t die on her own, she died as the direct result of the driver hitting her. For the purpose of accurately portraying who took an action and who was acted upon, it should emphasize the driving, not the dying.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The discussion was active voice vs passive voice, not functionality of active voice vs functionality of differently-worded active voice. They're both still active voice.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

@PapaStevesy IMO active voice includes focusing the sentence on the subject that did the action, not the one that was acted upon but by all means let’s argue about grammatical definitions instead of the problem of motorists killing people and journalists normalizing it. 🙄

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I mean, you're literally the one who started the argument, being dismissive and condescending about it now just makes you look like a sore loser.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You're the one doing that. Killed/died same difference, but I apologize for not using the same verb as the original quote for clarity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Correct. I said killed.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Very interesting, thank you. I was wondering if that also happens in other countries. It is sadly the norm in Germany when reporting car accidents.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ärztin wurde von Auto erfasst und erlag ihren Verletzungen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Upvote for a better headline and for n-browser translation

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Even the word "accident" is part of that downplaying.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Somebody told me that at her hospital they don't say "accident" since it's always preventable. They say "collision"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

The army shifted to this verbiage as well from “accidental discharge” to “negligent discharge” when at the clearing barrels or while on patrol.

Also increased the punishment, and it helped quite a bit in reducing the knuckleheads. No longer a “whoops! Mah bad”

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

I suspect the tone is used so they aren't sued for stuff. I understand it but I disagree on their usage of it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"Car driver kills doctor on bicycle"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Works too, though more specific on assignment of judgment. Part of the point for me is to assign blame to the system in which we all must live.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

“Car driver kills children's doctor on bicycle”

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

While I agree with the car centric aspect of this, you should read the article. The top bullets are more specific, and the driver may have had a medical incident.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Thanks, I did. Then I wrote the comment, copied the quote directly from the article. It is the first sentence of the article. I also said the cyclist died, made no indication that the person was "murdered" or anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

That's a because there is no speculation that she was murdered. If the driver had a stroke, or some other medical incident, it would not be murder.