EDIT2: Below is my updated analysis making the case for a staged assassination attempt
I think the deep state is involved in this operation but the case I’ll be making below is that we can’t exclude that this operation is a staged assassination attempt.
Indeed, many of us in the “truther” community came to the conclusion that Trump, to the same extent as Biden, is a deep state asset. If this is true, it would then be difficult to explain why the deep state would want to assassinate their front-running candidate.
You may find ridiculous the idea that Trump is a deep state asset when the narrative that Trump is fighting the deep state is broadly accepted. However, did you know that Trump has numerous deep state ties including with the Rothschild, Epstein and Soros? Also, how to explain the involvement of Trump in the deep state Qanon psyop (through the Qproofs) if Trump is going after the deep state? In 2016, Trump got elected on the promise that he will drain the swamp but instead of draining it, he appointed the swamp to his administration (Barr, Ross, Acosta who were all associates of Epstein). Don’t believe me? I recommend you watched these two mirrored videos from Jake Morphonios (most of his research had been taken off the internet):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WpxeUOiWikO9
https://www.bitchute.com/video/QAW9y6emuHWB
If it is a false flag, then how can we explain that the deep state would have taken the risk to kill Trump by aiming at his ear? It seems like a very dangerous stunt even for a skilled shooter. To this my response is, what evidence do we have that a bullet grazed Trump’s ear? We have:
- photographic evidence:
- Bullet passing by Trump:
- Blood on Trump’s right hand after touching his ear:
- ballistic sound analysis evidence (source: youtu.be/LouUbMYb7Bc) Are these evidences indisputable proofs that a bullet grazed Trump’s ear? As of now, I would say no and here is why.
First regarding the photographic evidence. It’s important to note that these photos were taken by Doug Mills who is a renowned photographer but also part of the “mockingbird media sphere”. Interesting fact, did you know that he’s the photographer who took the photo of Bush in a classroom when being notified that the 9/11 attacks just happened? (source: www.politico.com…os-226744/ / www.tampabay.com…11-attack/ ). Since Doug Mills has been following many Presidents it’s not necessarily improbable that he was with Bush on 9/11, however what are the chances that he would be covering a small Trump’s rally? Has Doug Mills covered other Trump’s rallies? If not, he’s for sure very lucky to have been attending this one.
Also, I’m not an expert in photo forensic but until we have the confirmation from multiple independent experts that these photos haven’t been tampered with, I wouldn’t consider these photographic evidences as definitive evidence. What if the bullet and blood would have been added to the originals? I’ve looked at the video of the shooting and while the resolution is not as good, I couldn’t see any trace of blood on Trump’s right hand. This element is certainly worth investigating further.
Screenshots from the video showing no apparent trace of blood:
Second, regarding the ballistic sound analysis evidence the hypothesis is that some bullets are passing by Trump’s microphone which leads us to conclude that the first three shots are composed of a supersonic bullet sound followed by the crack of the gun. However, in the hypothesis in which no bullet were aimed at Trump, could we come to a different but still coherent conclusion? For instance, it could be possible that the first 6 sounds (3 supersonic and 3 cracks) are actually coming from 2 different guns shooting in a synchronized manner to appear as they were shot from a single gun shooting three bullets at Trump. The video analysis from John Cullen seems to be supporting this hypothesis (although he’s not discussing the hypothesis that the event could have been staged) as he claims that the first shot couldn’t have been aimed at Trump. Source: rumble.com/v57df…empt-.html
In conclusion, I don’t think we have yet any evidence allowing us to indisputably conclude that any shot was aimed at Trump.
If the scenario of an assassination attempt can’t be confirmed yet, what evidences do we have to support the scenario of a staged assassination? First, we should remind ourselves that the deep state had executed several more complex false flag operations before. So saying “it couldn’t have been done” is ignoring a core expertise of the deep state. To be clear, I don’t think we have any definitive evidence for this scenario either but here some elements that weights towards it:
- Despite the presence of 2 or 3 shooters (1 or 2 with military equipment) and having only one (maybe two) shooter being neutralized, they failed their alleged assassination mission.
- All shooters missed their target and shot at the crowd. According to John Cullen, one shooter wasn’t aiming at Trump but allegedly at a secret service sniper however, why would they have aimed at only one unit of SS sniper when several were present? Wouldn’t it have been more effective to aim directly at Trump to reach their assassination mission?
- If we had multiple shooters and only Crooks was neutralized, how to explain that the second and potential third shooters didn’t attempt to assassinate Trump again when he got up on his feet and was directed to his car?
- The presence of the “mockingbird” photograph Doug Mills needs further investigation. How many Trump’s rallies was Doug Mills present at? Why would he have chosen this one which was a small rally?
- The timing of the shooting is interesting. The shooting happened as Trump was commenting a chart (it would be interesting to know how often Trump has commented a chart before in his rallies). As a magician on stage, Trump could have been using the power of attention and misdirection to successfully divert the attention of the crowd off of him. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that Trump said “take a look” five times (and pointed at the chart) to direct the attention of the public to the chart just before the shots started. Maybe this explains why we still don’t have any footage from crowd that was behind Trump. - -Maybe all eyes were focused on the chart. That’s too bad because it may have help us settling the question as to whether or not a bullet grazed Trump’s ear.
- Why did the FBI clean the roof on which Crooks was located. Did we search for any evidence of gun powder? What evidence do we have that Crook even fire a single shot? There were many professional snipers that day and Crook wasn’t one of them. He may have been killed before firing even a single shot.
- In the end, this event strongly solidify the posture of Trump as a national Hero victim of dark deep state forces. The sequence of events aligns perfectly to benefit the Trump camp (right before the RNC). Overall, it almost seems too perfect for Trump (and maybe scripted) than organic chaos.
- The recount of the shooting by Trump (during the RNC) is not authentic and seems scripted (he says that as he was still on the ground, the crowd was pointing at the shooter and people could see all the blood, source: youtu.be/4MVep85ykg4) reinforcing the narrative that Trump is not in control and people are pulling strings behind him.
- There are numerous past evidences that Trump is owned by some elements of the deep state hence, why would they want to kill him unless the deep state is divided in multiple factions of divergent interests.
What would be the motives for a false flag/staged assassination attempt?
- Discredit the narrative that Trump is a deep state asset
- Counter the rise of RFK (non-controlled opposition) currently polling at 19%
- Prop up Trump as a national Hero and broadening his support in preparation of a potential involvement in WW3 (or other major event requiring the mobilization of the whole population)
EDIT: After reviewing additional videos, I don’t think the position of the bleachers and Comperatore are accurately reported in the Abovetopsecret.com post. Further investigation of this element would be required to definitely state whether or not Comperatore was in alignment with Trump and the shooter. I can’t exclude he was victim of a lost bullet aimed at Trump as opposed to having been aimed at.
Multiple theories have emerged regarding the assassination attempt on Trump. The two most discussed are:
- An attempt from a lone wolf shooter
- An attempt from the deep state to eliminate their enemy
The former doesn’t appear very credible unless we are willing to accept multiple gross negligences within the Secret Service and other police forces present that day. Indeed, a local NBC affiliate reported that the gunman was spotted on a rooftop 3 hours before the shooting and an officer even reported the suspect 30 minutes before the shooting (https://www.virtue.news/trump-shooter-identified-3-hours-before-assassination-attempt-law-enforcements-critical-oversight-revealed/). While the mockingbird CNN media pushes the narrative that the shooter was spotted only 1 min and 57 seconds before the shooting (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Akb7bPCrfAs).
The latter would seem like the obvious alternative scenario. However, for those who came to the conclusions that Trump, such as Biden, is a deep state asset, this doesn’t quite make sense. Why would the deep state wants to eliminate their front-running candidate? You may find ridiculous the idea that Trump is a deep state asset when the narrative that Trump is fighting the deep state is broadly accepted. However, did you know that Trump has numerous deep state ties including with the Rothschild, Epstein and Soros? Also, how to explain the involvement of Trump in the Qanon psyop (through the Qproofs) if Trump is going after the deep state? In 2016, Trump got elected on the promise that he will drain the swamp but instead of draining it, he appointed the swamp to his administration (Barr, Ross, Acosta who were all associates of Epstein). Don’t believe me? I recommend you watched these two mirrored videos from Jake Morphonios (most of his research had been taken off the internet):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WpxeUOiWikO9 https://www.bitchute.com/video/QAW9y6emuHWB
So if it’s not a lone wolf or deep state assassination attempt, what hypothesis are we left with?
The one that comes to mind is a false flag assassination attempt from the deep state aiming to:
- Discredit the narrative that Trump is a deep state asset
- Counter the rise of RFK currently polling at 19%
- Prop up Trump as a national Hero and broadening his support in preparation of a potential involvement in WW3
Although at first glance this scenario may seem ridiculous, we shall first remind ourselves that the deep state had executed several more complex false flag operations before. So saying “it couldn’t have been done” is ignoring a core expertise of the deep state.
If it is a false flag, then how can we explain that the deep state would have taken the risk to kill Trump by aiming at his ear? It seems like a very dangerous stunt even for a skilled shooter. To this my response is, what evidence do we have that a bullet grazed Trump’s ear? Objectively, we have none. It’s very possible that fake blood would have been applied to Trump after he went to the ground. Maybe it's even real blood and his ear was clipped by a SS agent while they were surrounding him out of sight of the cameras. There had been shots fired and even a person killed in the crowd but nothing prove that the shooter actually aimed at Trump. He could have shot at the crowd from a safe distance from Trump. Moreover, according to an aerial view shared on https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1349940/pg1, it appears that Corey Comperatore (the victim) wasn’t even close to be in the alignment of Trump and the shooter.
So unless the shooter changed his aim mid round (for which reasons?), he couldn’t have killed Comperatore by aiming at Trump. The author of the thread on abovetopsecret.com uses this element to make the case that a second shooter may have been aiming at Trump (comforting the scenario of a deep state attempt on Trump) but I simply think that the explanation is that the shooter (probably a MKUltra asset) wasn’t tasked to kill Trump but to aim at the crowd instead still creating the perception of an assassination on Trump.
I’d like to hear your thoughts on what holes this third scenario might have!
Still upvoting because this is excellent analysis/hypothesizing.
How do you discredit the photograph of the bullet whizzing right past his head though?
Looks similar to the image showing us a plane hit the pentagon.
I'm not an expert in image forensic so I will refrain to conclude anything based on this image which could have either been modified or presenting a misleading perspective (the bullet could be farther from Trump than we assume) or even taken on a different day in a secured environment. It certainly wouldn't be the most difficult element to fake in order to mislead the public. And keep in mind it was published by the mockingbird New York Times paper. Can you definitively trust this source for not tampering with a photo? I don't think so. That said I agree that it's not an element that we should discount, I just don't have the expertise to interpret it and considering the multiple ways it could be tampered with, I don't think this element could change the conclusions one way or the other.
I'm no expert either, but this picture alone tilts most theories in the extreme schizo land as far as I'm concerned. We live in an age that's flooded with young psychotic shooters and a workforce devoid of realistic incentives. This makes negligent secret service and less trigger happy cops. I'm staying skeptical of course, but to propose conspiracy here is to go against a mountain of evidence and sound observations.
But what definitive evidence do we have here? Based on the testimonies it's difficult to believe that the shooter acted without the support of part of the chain of command within the Secret Service, so already a conspiracy is a likely scenario. Then, come the question of which definitive proofs do we have that the shooter aimed at Trump? We only have a photo published by a mockingbird media. It's quite weak. On top of this, we now have some elements pointing out that the alignment of Trump, the shooter and the victim are inconsistent with the hypothesis that the victim would have been killed as a result of a lost bullet. IMO, this is the canary in the coal mine that needs further investigation.
Definitive evidence doesn't exist for any claim if you get paranoic enough. What evidence do we have that the Secret Service is effective? I'm no history buff, but I think 60+ years of W's in the most technologically advanced weapons era has to count for something.
Calling multiple pictures/videos that corroborate events "weak" puts the burden of proof heavily against you here. You're grasping at geometry and angles straws whilst dismissing the most concrete evidence one can fathom. It's difficult to believe what evidence will satiate this lack of logic. Feel free to posit some potential evidence that would pull you back to the non-conspiratorial realm. I really don't think there is any. The boring truth is a tough pill to swallow in the age of disinformation folks
If we were living in a world of no conspiracy and didn’t have evidence that Trump is to some extent owned by deep state actors, you would have a point. But how to not ask for a high level of evidence when we’ve seen in recent years many horrible but proven false flags/conspiracies? As far as I can tell, there is so far no evidence that this event could not have been staged hence, I’m not going to change years of research leading to my understanding that:
Of course those who haven’t realized point 1 and 2 will go for the most obvious explanation which is that this was a failed assassination attempt.
More info on this photo:
Did you know that the photo of the bullet in the air behind Trump was taken by Doug Mills, the same photographer who took the photo of Bush in a classroom when being notified that the 9/11 attacks just happened? It seems that this renowned journalist is often at the right time in random places just before major historical events unfold. He’s a lucky one.
I don’t know if this photo is real or had been modified or even taken at an earlier day in a controlled environnement but it’s an interesting coincidence.
Also, it’s unclear to me if the trajectory of the bullet which seems mostly parallel to the ground is a realistic trajectory for a shoot fired from an elevated vantage point.
Also, we still haven’t seen a detailed animation showing the trajectory of the bullets based on the shooter’s position and Trump. How likely it is that those would have been lost bullet killing and injuring spectators?
Hard to tell without a precise animation but intuitively I would think that lost bullets would have been more likely to hit the ground around Trump than the crowd by the simple fact that the shooter was at an elevated position in comparison to Trump.