this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
173 points (94.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5237 readers
437 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
173
Tesla Cybertruck gets vandalized by climate activists (electrek.co)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

See this is why I said it was pointless to argue.

  • Your comment was extremely hyperbolic, relied more on emotion, and made some claims that sounded completely unbelievable
  • You posted an article claiming it to "prove" your claim. It didn't prove anything, but provided decent evidence in direct contradiction to what you claimed
  • You then tried to argue in a way that defies any sort of common sense. Of course people with pickup trucks also use them to get groceries. Do you expect them to have an entirely different car that they'll be using unless they specifically need pickup truck specific features? That's insane
  • You also moved the goal posts of what defined needing a pickup truck. Your definition is extremely restrictive, and isn't referenced in the article. Again this is the article you yourself chose.

You've 100 percent what you're gonna believe. That belief is based off your own personal hatred of pickup trucks. I wouldn't be surprised if this didn't somehow tie into a larger aspect of your identity via some weird political connection. It's like talking to a 7th grader. Pointless.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Holy mother of projection... No thanks.