this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
12 points (83.3% liked)

UK Politics

3089 readers
52 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The real election night winner was not Labour, but an elaborately feathered hat - if certain corners of social media are to be believed.

The hat in question - a majestic purple wide-brimmed number, adorned with fluffy ostrich feathers - belongs to the returning officer in Blyth.

The outfit also included a ruffled collar, prompting Austin Powers jokes from social media users.

Read more:Uneasy voters hand Labour 'loveless landslide'Liz Truss among Tory big beasts who have lost their seats

"When you're a returning officer in Blyth at 11 and presiding over a Salem witch trial at midnight," one X user quipped.

Ms Bridgeman told the BBC that as she does not have Twitter, she was unaware of the social media storm her hat had prompted.


The original article contains 245 words, the summary contains 125 words. Saved 49%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!