Quark's

1091 readers

1 users here now

Come to Quark’s, Quark’s is Fun!

General off-topic chat for the crew of startrek.website. Trek-adjacent discussions, other sci-fi television, navigating the Fediverse, server meta (within reason), selling expired cases of Yamok sauce, it’s all fair game.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

-14

c/Quarks will change to "local only" when Lemmy 0.19.6 releases (startrek.website)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

EDIT 3: **Due to some bugs we're delaying this feature until Lemmy 0.19.6 is released! **

The goal of c/Quarks has always been to help foster a sense of community for StarTrek.website, but it is just a generic "offtopic" community and does not really have an identity of it's own on the Fediverse.

Thanks to the new feature in Lemmy 19.4, we can create true "local only" communities. And Quark's can be what it was originally intended to be, a place for our users. This will allow us to better discuss what kind of experience users of this instance wish to have (not just provide) without all the dorks on less cool instances coming here and ruining our weather control network.

Smiling

EDIT: to those of you concerned about missing out on "trek-adjacent discussion" @[email protected] has indicated they plan on loosening the "on topic" rule of /c/StarTrek to include more of that.

EDIT2: If anyone is interested in growing and operating a community on our instance, please feel free to reach out or comment here!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

From what I can see, you've only participated in this community once, nine months ago.

The other communities (StarTrek, Daystrom, Risa, etc.) are all staying open and federated.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

@ValueSubtracted oh I didn't realize there were requirements for "participation" my bad

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It was just a point of clarification in case you misunderstood.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

@ValueSubtracted oh I completely understand now that liking, boosting, or privately enjoying posts is not an acceptable level of engagement in an online community where "participation" is required. Thanks 🖖💫

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

@starkraving666
@ValueSubtracted
Never trust an instance with a closed governance process

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

@starkraving666
@ValueSubtracted
Except jorts which transcends governance entirely

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

@jonny @starkraving666 @ValueSubtracted wait, we have governance?

I thought the owner of this instance just set it up in some substance-induced euphoria and then forgot it existed

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago