this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
268 points (94.7% liked)

World News

38987 readers
1812 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 months ago (3 children)

victim surcharge of £154.

WHAT VICTIM??? The article says nothing of him doing anything to others. To my knowledge he didn't attack anyone. There's no victim!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He is the victim. It's a charge on him.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Soooooo, either he should get the money, as the victim, or the charge is basically police charging victims money for being victims.

.....I feel like I'm missing something here.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This "victim surcharge" would be termed court cost or court fee in the US.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What a strange name if thats the purpose.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Oh, I wasn't accusing you of lying. I was just saying it's such a strange name for a charge that has a legitimate purpose, but is named in a way that has nothing to do with that purpose.

Kinda like if you took an uber, and they charged you for the "poopy diaper charge". And you say nobody on your trip even wore a diaper. So the driver tells you it's so he can refill his gas in the car.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Victims of every crime that has one.
It's a fund for paying compensation to victims of crime and £154 is just what you have to pay to it if you get jailed for 6 months or below.

So when someone does commit a crime that has a payout to a victim, it doesn't matter if they have money or not as it comes from the fund to the victim first.
Kinda like... If you got hit with an extra vehicle/traffic insurance bill every time you get a speeding ticket or get caught driving drunk, even if you didn't cause an accident.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Oh, ok. Thats a far better description than the other guy said of just "court costs".

I would say that America needs something like that, but, I just can't see the money ACTUALLY going to victims. I see some policeman, or politician, or whomever, pocketing it if they tried that here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Good feckin point!