this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
214 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59340 readers
5881 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
214
New York Times warns freelancers of GitHub repo data breach (www.bleepingcomputer.com)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
  • The New York Times suffered a breach of its GitHub repositories in January 2024, leading to the theft and leak of sensitive personal information of freelancers.
  • Attackers accessed the repos using exposed credentials, but the breach did not impact the newspaper's internal systems or operations.
  • The stolen data, amounting to 273GB, was leaked on 4chan and included various personal details of contributors as well as information related to assignments and source code, including the viral Wordle game.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It is not Microsoft's job to protect your password, it is yours.

Or did you assume it was GitHub itself that was compromised? The article doesn't say where the creds were obtained. My guess is plain old phishing. Though it could also be cred-stealing malware, that seems to be making a comeback, in the form of browser extensions and mobile apps. Either way, those aren't Microsoft's fault.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Or did you assume it was GitHub itself that was compromised?

That's the way it reads to me.

My guess is plain old phishing.

Going back to my previous comment, if it was obtained through fishing, there would be no need for "hacking".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

“Hacking” is a catch all term for security breaches, including phishing to the general public.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No it is not

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yes it is. You can be a pedantic a-hole all you want, but “hacking” includes phishing, social engineering and pretty much any other form of access control circumvention to the general public.

Edit:

Also from the article itself

A 'readme' file in the archive states that the threat actor used an exposed GitHub token to access the company's repositories and steal the data.

Exposed GitHub token is very likely someone messed up and either exposed a token or was victim to an attack that could pull the token. Those are not uncommon and have happened to a lot of companies.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Assuming the writer is using the word properly is not being pedantic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Reading the article proves your assumption wrong

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

...huh?