this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
719 points (99.2% liked)

Jellyfin: The Free Software Media System

5698 readers
13 users here now

Current stable release: 10.10.0

Community Standards

Website

Forum

GitHub

Documentation

Feature Requests

Matrix (General Information & Help)

Matrix (Announcements)

Matrix (General Development)

Matrix (Off-Topic) - Come get to know the team and blow off steam!

Matrix Space - List of all the available rooms on Matrix.

Discord - Bridged to our Matrix rooms

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We have quite a budget collected over the last 5 years, and while we're really happy to see so many in the Jellyfin community contribute to us, we want to ask you to stop!

No, really. We don't actually need your money. At least, not here and now.

We have over $24,000 in the bank, and with average monthly expenses of only ~$600, that's over 40 months (3.3 years) of runway! So, we have plenty of money for the near future.

Thus, at this time, we want you to seriously consider donating to the authors of Clients you use, instead of (or in addition to) the main project. Client support is the hardest part of the Jellyfin ecosystem to keep going, and most of them are maintained by only a single person or very small team. With the API changes in 10.9.0 and the upcoming 10.10.0 releases, they're going to be very busy trying to keep up, and thus could really use your support in a way that the core project here doesn't right now.

So, if there's a client you use every day and that you love, consider finding it's author in our list of official clients, and sending them a little something instead (or too).

No, this doesn't violate our policy of "no paid development", because donations are just that - donations. We will still not honour bug bounties or similar, and still not use our collective finance here for paid development. So don't feel like you're doing something wrong, you're not!

I'll leave this notice up until we drop to ~1 year (12 months) of remaining runway, at which time we can re-evaluate where we're at.

Happy watching!

I personally would rather see then take some of the "extra" money and apportion it to suitable client projects themselves, but I can understand them not wanting to become financial administrators in that way.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why don't they donate to related projects

[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Taking donations for a specific purpose (developing jellyfin core) then spending it on something else (donations to other related projects) is something donors and tax authorities generally frown on

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Maybe start a new fund then. They could get people to redirect there funds to projects in need of help. Think CoreJS and such.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

And take time away from jellyfin to administer it? Nah, let people donate to the client they use makes the most sense. They have a list of clients they like, why isn't that enough?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If I donate to a project or charity, o would not be happy of my money went to another project I didn't agree with. Especially when bad things could happen our of their control. It is all risk, no benefit. Advising donators to donate where its needed is better than using their donated funds.

If they donated to a client for a niche device and it turned out there was code in it that gobbled up peoples data without consent it would backfire horribly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

True, maybe create a list of projects that need funding.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

They mention in the post that they have a list of official clients you can choose to donate to.

So, if there’s a client you use every day and that you love, consider finding it’s author in our list of official clients, and sending them a little something instead (or too).

It would probably be helpful if they included a link to that list in the post, though it is just one click from the projects homepage, and made it clearer that the list does include at least some subset of third-party clients. Though it would also be reasonable to infer that from the quote.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Or just let the users decide for themselve?
They are grown up enough to install a program. They are probably old enough to just take their money elsewhere and as the Jellyfin team asked to, donate to some other Jellyfin 3rd party dev.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

The average person isn't going to delve into the nuance of open source project structure. If I wanted to support the jellyfin ecosystem, I would probably expect that donating to the jellyfin project is sufficient.