this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024

561 points (97.6% liked)

World News

39004 readers

3264 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

561

Biden: ‘every reason’ to believe Netanyahu is prolonging Gaza war for political gain (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

118 comments fedilink hide all child comments

US president’s remarks to Time magazine about PM’s role in conflict draw heavily critical response from Israeli government

Joe Biden has said that there is “every reason” to draw the conclusion that Benjamin Netanyahu is prolonging the war in Gaza for his own political self-preservation.

Biden made the remarks about the Israeli prime minister in an interview with Time magazine published on Tuesday morning, drawing a sharp response from the Israeli government, which accused the US president of straying from diplomatic norms.

Netanyahu’s popularity plummeted after the 7 October attack by Hamas, which exposed serious flaws in Israeli security. Most political observers say Netanyahu would lose elections if they were held now, and would be forced into opposition, facing court hearings on corruption charges. But elections have been put off until the war is over, or at least until major military operations are deemed to have been completed.

Time asked Biden whether he believed Netanyahu was “prolonging the war for his own political self-preservation”.

“I’m not going to comment on that,” the president said in response, but added: “There is every reason for people to draw that conclusion.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (6 children)

The US president doesn’t control the world, contrary to popular American opinion.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You don't think the military support, and the diplomatic cover for Israel that the US provides at the UN (100% within Biden's prerogative) has any influence on the situation?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The US president is literally going around his own Congress to ensure the Israelis are always well stocked with weapons during their genocide.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Yah, those Republicans have just kept trying to shut down weapons sales to Israel at every turn, eh?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago

UN veto power goes a long way.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If he stopped supplying weapons, the war would stop as Israel wouldn't have the resources to continue the war on its own.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The US is not the only country who sells weapons to Israel. And, Israel manufactures weapons too. Having fewer super-cool missiles isn’t going to stop them from using the huge stockpile they already have.

What a ridiculous American concept that everything revolves around you.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If they don't even need them, why do we give them any?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because the military industrial complex is the ruler of the world and our elected leaders are just for show?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Can't argue with that!

[+] [email protected] -8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You can easily look this up. But of course you're not arguing in good faith.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh I see now... Biden is "striking a difficult balance" between his support for genocide, and his public image of not enjoying it.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You completely diregarded the article. Not that I expected you to read it. You asked why and here's the answer.

Legally, the U.S. can’t cut Israel off completely. Since 2008, the U.S. has had to weigh all arms sales to Israel and other countries in the region against the requirement that Israel maintains a “qualitative military edge” against all enemies, both state and non-state actors.

The Biden administration in late April decided to pause a shipment of 3,500 “dumb” — aka, unguided — munitions that officials expected Israel to use in Rafah: 1,800 of those were 2,000-pound bombs and 1,700 of those were 500-pound bombs. U.S. officials were particularly concerned about the 2,000-pound bombs and the impact the massive weapon would have in a dense urban setting.

In announcing the pause, Biden for the first time acknowledged that civilians had been killed by these weapons in Gaza.

“Civilians have been killed in Gaza as a consequence of those bombs and other ways in which they go after population centers,” Biden said on CNN, referring to 2,000-pound bomb. “I’ve made it clear to Bibi and the war cabinet: They’re not going to get our support, if in fact they go on these population centers.”

The bombs were approved by Congress in 2021. They had been licensed by the administration, manufactured, and ready to be shipped when the order came down to pause the movement.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Ah yes, the law. It can be ignored when necessary and used as an excuse when convenient. How else could Biden be "striking a balance"? If he is bound by this law, why not condemn Israel's genocide in strongest terms? That would be a balance, eh? And what about the law that says we can't supply arms for an ongoing genocide? Ah right, he won't call it a genocide-- conveniently sidestepping that law.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's mostly them, though, with a bit of contribution from Germany.

I'm not actually sure if being cut off hard would stop them, what with Netanyahu's personal freedom in the mix, but it would hurt a lot.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Nope. The German government stopped issuing weapon export licenses within days. Some stuff arrived that needed licenses but is completely useless in a genocide (training ammunition, artillery charges (not rounds but the propellant part) going to industry for testing), the rest is almost certainly useless in a genocide: 5000 Panzerfaust 2. Kind of hard to deny them that export as they happen to own the producer and Hamas, last I checked, doesn't even have tanks and as they're shaped charges they really only are sensible to use against hard targets.

We still do export plenty of dual-use and non-weapon military equipment, though, those have lower export requirements. Helmets, replacement parts for radars, suchlike.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

So just the US then, haha.

Italy also gave them a few helicopters, which amounted to a percent of the total value or so, but everyone else gave pretty much purely symbolic aid before this kicked off. Germany and the US were the whole pie chart.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But Biden, The American President, could at the very least abide by American Laws in regards to aid. Isreal has been in violation of the FSA for decades and this genocide breached the Leahy Law months ago.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Which American laws are you referring to?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

FSA and Leahy Law.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Biden cannot unilaterally stop providing aid to Israel without Congress. The allocation of foreign aid, including military assistance to Israel, is governed by laws and appropriations passed by Congress.

Please don’t misinterpret my lack of finger pointing to be support for Israel. Biden certainly could take a more outspoken position.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Both of those laws are in fact laws. Things that can only be passed by Congress and the President working together. If Congress does not repeal them then the President is still bound by them. The current Congress can appropriate as much money as it wants for a genocidal regime. According to the FSA and Leahy Law it should sit right in that bank account and never get sent to the genocidal regime.

Biden has all the legal cover he needs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I’m not sure it’s that easy… but I do agree a lot more could be done. If even just a “temporary suspension” until further investigation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Of course not. The aliens do!