Technology

59285 readers

4685 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Tesla must face fraud suit for claiming its cars could fully drive themselves (arstechnica.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I think he truly believed all that. He did not lie, he was wrong about the future. Or at least that would be his legal defense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Funny how rich people can get away with that. I could say I fully believe I’m going to win $50 million in the lottery next week, buy a bunch of shit I can’t pay for, and probably wind up jailed pretty shortly thereafter and nobody would bat an eye. Rich guy selling vaporware? No problem, he just believed his own hype train. Sorry, investors.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Except he claimed Tesla had the technology working NOW in 2019. Which is a factually false statement not about beliefs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are plenty of bosses like him out there. Completely high on their own shit. He reads about technology in a sci-fi book, and thinks he can Steve Jobs into bullying workers into making it a reality. Completely deludes himself into thinking it’s real and sells it to investors with full confidence. He has no idea of the actual technical challenges and fully convinces himself his genius brain could figure it out if he wasn’t so “busy” all the time. Everything is perpetually just 6 months away.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The worst part is that he doesn't even understand the sci-fi he consumes. He said this not too long ago:

Grok is an AI modeled after The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, so intended to answer almost anything and, far harder, even suggest what questions to ask!

Every AI in the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy was broken, an asshole or both. Douglas Adams clearly thought the idea of a "human-like" AI was abhorrent. Especially one developed by a giant corporation.

Also, he thinks the name of the main character in Blade Runner is "Bladerunner."

https://futurism.com/the-byte/elon-musk-main-character-blade-runner

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

And the word grok comes from stranger in a strange land, not hitchhikers guide.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

True, and since part of the meaning of grok in the book was 'to love,' naming your "anti-woke" AI after that suggests he also didn't understand that book.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't think he meant an AI from the book, I think he meant the actual Hitchhiker's Guide. The one that says don't panic on the cover

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Which, again, was incredibly corrupt and run by a soulless corporation that didn't actually care about the truth.