this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

tumblr

3404 readers
451 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
8
Old person traits (pawb.social)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I understand it from the women's point of view and I didn't mean to be mysoganistic in any form, but it is in the DNA of men to want to be a good provider and I think, if you're being honest, that many women look for that as an attractive trait in a male partner.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I understand that you weren't trying to be mysoginistic, but I am disagreeing with your premise that the provider role for men & women wanting it is some kind of natural state. These roles have been enforced, and can be unlearnt. It's also not binary. It may well be that in a perfect world without any societal pressure, more men than women want to provide. But how many? Having a higher probability doesn't imply that it's deterministic for all people.

The only biological aspect I agree with is that being pregnant changes women, because this is backed by studies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I respect your opinion and thank you for tackling my point of view head on, rather than just picking the bones out of semantics the way that some others in this thread have.