58
England gets 27 new bathing sites – but no guarantee they’ll be safe for swimming
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
58 points (98.3% liked)
United Kingdom
4065 readers
27 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I mean, it's a result of using older combined sewers. The sewer and drains go to the same place, so when there's enough rain, the system gets overwhelmed and dumps some amount without treating it.
I'm sure that if people are willing to pay what it'd cost to upgrade the sewer system, that upgrading it isn't a problem, but it's not free, and one has to weigh the cost against that benefit.
I've got one relative living in a city in the US that's in the process of doing that shift away from a combined sewer system, and the total cost of the rebuild is around $5,000 per resident (not household, but resident). That's a fair bit of money to ask the population to pay.
In their case, it wasn't driven purely by a desire to convert from a combined sewer system, but because the existing system needed to be fixed, and if you're going to have to do major repairs anyway, then it's time to bite the bullet and pay for dealing with the combined sewer. I'm thinking that it may be that British cities might do something like that -- kick the can down the road until the system really has to be replaced anyway, and then pay what it costs to move away from the combined sewer.
The water companies have been paying dividends to their shareholders while not doing anything to upgrade the sewerage system. Certainly the people won't want to pay twice for the upgrade.