this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
87 points (100.0% liked)
chat
7976 readers
57 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I usually hear people claim that US military spending in the EU, Japan etc. allows those countries to focus their economy on healthcare and education, since the US is eating their military costs and "protecting" them.
This is the first I've heard a claim that the US directly subsidizes other countries' healthcare.
The argument they're probably referring to is the idea that the US spends money to make the drugs and innovate while other countries just make them. Because US companies eat the cost of innovation, the prices in the US are higher.
Of course its all bullshit because a significant portion of new drugs are funded by the US government and then privatized for no real reason.