this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
65 points (100.0% liked)

covid

683 readers
3 users here now

Try to include sources for posts No Covid misinformation, including anti-vaxx, anti-mask, anti-lockdown takes.

COVID MINIMIZATION = BAN

This community is a safe space for COVID-related discussion. People who minimize/deny COVID, are anti-mask, etc... will be banned.

Off-topic posts will be removed

Jessica Wildfire's COVID bookmark list

Covid.Tips

COVID-safe dentists: (thanks sovietknuckles)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Research published today in Lancet Infectious Disease and supported by PolyBio Research Foundation provides the strongest evidence yet that the COVID virus can persist for months or years after infection. The findings, published by a UC San Francisco/Harvard Medical School team, found that proteins created by the virus were still present for up to 14 months in a quarter of people tested. This demonstrates SARS-CoV-2 viral persistence as an urgent area of research underlying a breadth of chronic disease after COVID.

“The fact that every new SARS-CoV-2 infection has the potential to become chronic is perhaps the single most concerning aspect of this virus” says Dr. Amy Proal, President of PolyBio. “We have compelling data that viral persistence is much more common than recognized which could have major health implications.”

wtf

However, with an estimated 18 million adults and 5.8 million children suffering from Long COVID, government investment is also needed. SARS-CoV-2 has even been found in the lymph nodes of children months after COVID, suggesting persistent infection can begin early in life.

long suspected and showed up in research before, but here's more proof this is a thing.

Nearly all people in the study were not vaccinated, and generally the sicker they were the more likely they had viral persistance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

As of july, The Economist was putting excess morbidity at 24 million deaths. Despite what was commented in the post's body, The Economist was updating the numbers in the article without updating the article's date. They might still be doing it, but it's behind a paywall now.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I didn’t make that comparison lightly, I made it because the number of deaths is similar. The lower bound on covid death estimates is over 18 million, the likely number is closer to 30 million.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

I'm right there with ya. rat-salute