28
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
28 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15681 readers
225 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this.
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
This feels like some skull measuring shit.
Same reason I don't like when they do scans on trans people's brains to show that they are in line with their preferred gender. I understand that they're trying to find some kind of objective claim to being trans, but it's simply not going to work that way. It would only be weaponized.
People were searching pretty hard for the "gay gene" for a while there. Good fucking thing they didn't find anything.
Seems like whenever they do that what they end up with is “here are 20-30 genetic and environmental factors that are associated with [insert psychosexual type], but presence of any specific one doesn’t guarantee it.” Shit’s too complicated for “here is the singular gay/trans/etc gene.”