chapotraphouse

45% leftist

Rookie numbers. Gotta pump those numbers up ;)

Welcome. People here can be a bit overly aggressive sometimes when they see someone posting from another Lemmy instance due to the high likelihood of trolling or bad-faith engagement.

I didn't get the impression you were engaging in bad faith so I don't know aggression is warranted yet, even if many of us disagree with you.

Personally I can imagine a context where a person is compensated for their trouble when donating, whether that be blood or bone marrow or plasma or kidneys. But in a profit-driven system it opens up a lot of potential for hyper-exploitation of vulnerable communities. As it is, the idea that people have to sell their body parts to survive gets normalized incredibly quickly once any regulations are pulled back. Someone posted recently an ad for plasma donation with a smiling woman saying she donates plasma to pay rent. Sell yourself or be homeless, effectively.

We also have a very low opinion of the New York Times, a publication that frequently manufacturers consent for war, downplays working class struggles, etc. So the ghoulishness isn't solely coming from the basic idea of compensation for donation, but also that it's a bourgeois rag talking about yet another way poor people can be commodified. The same rag that tries to tell us inflation isn't a big deal, that the economy is doing fine, actually-- why are the poors whining again?

What parts of lefism and libertarianism do you agree with?