this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
194 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13198 readers
375 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

"Ghoulish" is a little knee-jerk, don't you think?

The proposed method to incentivize kidney donations seems well thought-out and non-coercive. It is structured in a way that makes it impossible or at least very difficult to sell a kidney as a way to "get rich quick" (get out of debt quick). Because it's awarded as tax credits, impoverished people would have little incentive to sell.

Meanwhile, the kidneys will go disproportionately to the poor and to the disadvantaged, since rich and advantaged people apparently have much less trouble finding volunteer donors.

There is a huge need for kidneys. Kidney failure causes great suffering. Having a second kidney isn't very useful. Why not cautiously incentivize donation?

Edit: I think people aren't realizing these are tax credits. Impoverished people who can't afford necessities won't be able to get any money from this.

Edit (2): Okay so apparently these are refundable tax credits, which rather skews things. But there are apparently a number of other safeguards the proposal would put in place to prevent ghoulish kidney harvesting. I think this proposal should really be taken seriously and considered carefully rather than dismissing it outright as "ghoulish" because it has the potential to save a lot of lives, especially low-income and disadvantaged lives.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Having the poors sell their organs is ghoulish, yes. No need to outsmart yourself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

This is aggravating. It's a carefully considered plan designed to avoid the ghoulish scenario of "poor people selling their kidneys," evidently designed by someone smarter than either of us.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

a government purchase program for kidneys isn't really that innovative. Many governments procure food grains, wool etc at a floor price.

the issue is with getting money involved. under capitalism, you have a class of unemployed, underemployed and underpaid workers who are desperate for money. it doesn't matter if Government is buying kidneys and distributing it through a fair lottery system, the coercive element is still there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

But the system is designed to avoid the scenario of poor and desperate people selling their kidneys.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

His organization’s proposal, for example, would split the $50,000 payment into installments arriving only around tax season to weaken donation as a get-rich-quick scheme. Even now, donation requires a weeks- to monthslong process of physical and psychological evaluation.

the compensation is still there. i meant that any compensation, whether in form of tax credits, installments or even a house is coercive under the capitalist system.

who do you think will be giving kidneys for $50,000? a person who earns $10k a year or a person earning $1m a year?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I'll admit I don't know much about American taxation, but in Canada someone who earns $10k a year pays $0 in taxes, and therefore would gain $0 from selling their kidneys under this scheme.

I reckon this option would mostly be considered by people who earn $80k a year or more. We should encourage more people in this bracket to be donating their kidneys.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (4 children)

It doesn't really matter how its designed. The reality is that only desperate people are going to sell their organs.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/100k-a-year-is-low-income-in-the-bay-area-according-to-new-report/

Besides, I don't see how a $10k a year tax credit for next five years would be an appealing incentive considering the 'cost' of doing the same is being cut open and having your kidney taken (much more invasive than a blood donation), if your other kidney fails you are screwed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

Counterpoint: no it's not

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're eligible to receive a kidney if you've operated a small business in a disadvantaged community for five years. The kidney will be delivered as a tax credit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Thst's cool! I didn't know that.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

This is a joke mocking liberals and their terrible ideas that help no one but rich people

I think this is a dangerous place for you if you're this gullible and this politically illiterate

Fair warning so you don't end up getting yourself dog piled for posting more shit takes, post carefully

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Seems like most recognize he is genuine and not sh*tposting or trolling... I have to admit I thought it was an elaborate bit (it still might be, I honestly cannot tell)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Pretty sure it’s genuine. I can imagine someone with family or a close friend on a donation list or someone who works for an organ donor organization trying to see this in a good light.

But yeah I was a little suspicious at first too.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (7 children)

The holocaust was also a carefully considered plan, but their reasons and the outcome they hoped for were as nonsense as this

A move like this under capitalism will only enhance suffering

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago (10 children)

There is a huge need for kidneys.

Shove tons of salt and sugar into every available fast food venue

"Damn, son, there sure are a lot of failed kidneys happening all of a sudden. Maybe we should legalize cannibalism to alleviate the problem?"

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago

Ghoulish" is a little knee-jerk, don't you think?

Nah, this is every bit as ghoulish as those "want to buy textbooks? Sell your blood!" ads that make the rounds here

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The proposed method to incentivize kidney donations seems well thought-out and non-coercive... Having a second kidney isn't very useful.

Thank you. I am stealing such things for future neoliberal (etc) parodies. Yeesh.

Ninja edit 1: In fact - I'm going to bookmark you because you are clearly a goldmine for parody!

Ninja edit 2: I scrolled down your profile - highly disturbing but amazing content.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm... glad to be of service?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Well I am glad you're a good sport about it at least.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (5 children)

If you are so concerned about the availability of organs, how about instead of exploiting the desperation and suffering of still living people to rip their kidneys out, we institute universal deceased organ donation first?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (7 children)

You have to consider that, even if it isn’t ghoulish or is somehow actually a good thing, it is an unbelievably terrible statement to make anyways. When you start saying “hey maybe we should start giving people money for their kidneys” it should immediately tell you that what’s going on is horrific. That’s why it’s ghoulish. Capitalism actively degraded and damages scientific progress. We might not have needed organ donors AT ALL if it wasn’t for capitalism’s constant bureaucracy preventing and stalling the development of organ replication. The ghoulish thing is that this person doesn’t talk about that. The sheer, unending injustice of the very fact we are asking this question AND NOT IMMEDIATELY BLAMING THOSE IN POWER is unbelievable.

load more comments (7 replies)