World News

22058 readers

57 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Chinese censors to restrict use of AirDrop and Bluetooth, activists fear it will further hinder their ability to mobilise people and share information (web.archive.org)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Bluetooth, AirDrop and such file-sharing services are crucial tools in China, where the so-called Great Firewall has resulted in one of the mostly tightly-controlled internet regimes. In recent years, anti-government protesters have often turned to AirDrop to organise and share their political demands. For instance, some activists were sharing anti-Xi Jinping posters using this tool on the Shanghai subway last October - just as the Chinese president was awaiting a historic third term as the country's leader.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Literally 0 sources anywhere and literally invokes 1984

Liberal propaganda is so fucking lazy. Y'all realize this is way closer to what 1984 was actually about right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a proposal by the literal government of China: http://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-06/06/c_1687698272954687.htm

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where in the article did you find that link?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@Venus The sources are clearly defined in the text, you can see that and find the link yourself if you are interested.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's just not how citing sources works lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, we have a genius here. The source, which is the Chinese government, and the way it is cited are both fine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the way it is cited

The way that it isn't cited*

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

It actually is cited, just read it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@Venus You may have missed some points when reading, so here are a few quotes.

The national internet regulator [Cyberspace Administration of China] on Tuesday launched a month-long public consultation on the proposals.

Proposals unveiled by the Cyberspace Administration of China on Tuesday ...

Phone and app developers who want to continue operating in China will have to play by the new rules - or be culled from app stores, said a software engineer who wanted to stay anonymous.

(Emphasis mine.)

I agree with you in that it paves the way further to George Orwell's 1984.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just saying that someone said something is not citing a source. They taught us this in elementary school.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

The source is the Chinese government, @kleinheld provided the link, everyone can easily verify that.