524
Finally, an answer! (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

(I know this is about Rifftrax, but we don't have a Rifftrax community.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Genetically modified plants is very different from selective breeding. Selective breeding mimics the natural evolution process, removing natural selection and replacing it with human decisions.

Using a separate root stock from your fruiting trees isn't genetic modification or breeding. It's just taking desirable size features from a root stock and growing your desired fruit from that. It still remains two different plant, with two different DNAs. The fruit would produce a child of the fruit tree, the same as if it was grown from seed. If the root tree was allowed to flower it would create a seed the same as if it were never grafted.

GMO are an extremely useful technology. When well regulated and tested will help produce food for the growing world population. The big problems with it are the consequences of it. Plant have been modified to tolerate high doses of weed killer, pesticides and fertilisers. These all help increase the productivity of the land, but the impacts are terrible on the local environment. Residual weed killer and pesticide may pose a risk to human as well.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Thanks. Comments above yours are a bit disingenuous, trying to bunch up intrusive lab techniques with selective breeding. While the definition of GMO is pretty vague, let's not pretend what Monsanto does is exactly the same as what Native Americans did.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

It's not. It's more advanced, and yes, it's better.

You know, more technology becomes available, you use it to make life better for everyone. Monsanto execta can go pound dicks, but in principle, GMO food is perfectly fine, safe, and healthy. If anything, it'll be more healthy (more vitamins), more plentiful as new crops can withstand droughts better, etc. etc. etc.

So far the only counter argument to that that I've heard here is "nuh uh!"

[-] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago

When well regulated and tested will help produce food for the growing world population.

No. It won't.

The Bill Gates/Monsanto Bootlicker Brigade wants to pretend that it's (somehow) the actual foodcrops we have at our disposal that is (somehow) "flawed" and therefore requires unnecessary and (thoroughly patentable) meddling to "fix" - but, like all capitalist "solutions" to the problems caused by capitalism, it is merely a disasterous (but profitable) distraction.

And, of course, this is quite apart from the fact that the right-wing histrionics about "population growth" has turned out like all other right-wing histrionics - false. In a few decades' time, you'll see these same capitalist bootlickers peddling the dubious wonders of GMOs now whining about population shrinkage.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

You realize that if you cross breed plants and come up with something new, you can patent it? The only point you actually made about GMO is not specific to GMO.

this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
524 points (97.5% liked)

MST3K

896 readers
218 users here now

Rules/guidelines/info

You know you want links, baby!

This community is hosted at https://lemmy.world/c/mst3k and moderated by:

If you were a mod on /r/MST3K give me a shout.

Confused about Lemmy/Fediverse? Here's a useful infographic

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS