this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
1029 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

11437 readers
1296 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 8 months ago (6 children)

"wasteland" is a bit strong. Non-native grass is not ideal, but we could do far worse. Good on you for improving your land. Let's not force everyone to be perfect, as many will just give up.

I think the focus on perfection leads to poor mental models and outcomes.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You're correct, but the north American concept of a "well kept yard" being two random trees and a bunch of freshly trimmed grass is absolutely horrendous. Beats an actual wasteland, but when most of your neighborhoods have rules that enforce this way of doing things it's a lot of wasted potential and does bring ecological consequences.

Again, while not ideal, actually living backyards with several native species could act as a local metapopulation model, with sources and sinks across the different houses.

This is something that people could and should take seriously and make active efforts to change. You already have the space, you're just not using it correctly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How do you mean sources and sinks?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Imagine you have a large circular area of native forest. All the populations living there are essentially homogenous, some species might form small groups but overall they can all interact directly, share the same resources, and mix genetic information.

Now humans come in, and instead of one continuous piece of land, you have segments of native forest surrounded by roads or semi-urban pathways. You can then imagine the populations as segmented bubbles.

This model of bubbles of native land surrounded by human landmarks is a tool ecology can use to predict how populations develop and interact. There are a lot of different permutations depending on size, biome, types of obstacles, and so on. But one of the most basic analysis you can do is detect bubbles that act as "sources" and bubbles that act as "drains" or "sinks". A source is a bubble with an excess of individuals, those are likely to cross the obstacles in their way and find themselves into other bubbles, supplying new individuals. Drains are bubbles where due to insufficient numbers, human activity or other factors, a species can't sustain a good number of individuals by themselves - they need immigrants from other bubbles.

This dynamic between sources providing new individuals and drains is fundamental for a metapopulation to exist even when the area is severely degraded by human activity. Imagine your well kept backyard providing bees to your neighbor with a sub-optimal one, for instance. This new metapopulation of bees is stable, even though the environment isn't ideal.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Focus on perfection? It's harder to maintain an ugly cut grass lawn than to just let it go wild and plant some native grasses/plants to overtake it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I really hard to play ball or have other activities on a non grass surface and many people particularly enjoy the look of a nice cut lawn. Both can coexist.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Ya, grass isn't inherently a bad thing. A lawn where I live in some serious desert is grotesquely wasteful, an appreciated lawn in other regions not so bad.

It's not the grass, it's capitalism. It's the eradication of native species for profit, and the spreading of fossil fuel derived fertilizers and poisons to support conspicuous consumption (real-estate values, golf, keeping up with the Joness, etc) that is problematic.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Except most grass, especially border areas like front lawns and street medians as well as corporate-owned lawns like around a drive-thru or suburban offices, gets zero use. It's one thing to have a dedicated play area in a yard or park that's cut grass; it's another thing to have the entire property as cut grass.

Everyone in my neighborhood has large cut grass lawns. There's mostly retired folks here are very few children. I spend a lot of time outside yet can literally count on one hand the number of times I have seen people out in those yards for a purpose other than cutting the grass. If you're not going to use it at least let the dandelions grow so the bees have something to eat!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

And the fucking noise from lawnmowers and whipper snippers all day long.

I'd like to relax and read a book outside, on my messy lawn but all my neighbours do is come outside, make noise for a couple of hours and once they have a 'perfect' lawn they fucking go back inside.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Nah, manicured lawns can't coexist with healthy ecosystems. They're hugely wasteful in general. There are alternatives that are equally nice to run on like clover and many areas have their own soft ground cover that's native. The best thing about native plants is that they're almost always lower maintenance. It just doesn't make sense to keep wasting water and other resources on lawns imo.

I recently let my garden grow wild and it's crazy how many flowers came up on their own. Now I've got all kinds of little critters and birds I hardly ever see elsewhere. The only thing I pull are goat head weeds because fuck those things lmao

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Really hard to play ball. Really is this the best defence for manicured lawns?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Have a picnic, play ball, participate in activities, or a plethora of other things. Pick one. If you don't want a lawn, don't have one. If you like play fetch with your dogs in weeds and flowers, you do you. As mentioned, both can exist. It happens all of the time.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago

In my area, ticks and rodents would move in. Not great for the things I do in my yard.

Native Grass are great, in general and in some areas of my yard, but not everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Wow what a horrible comment to be at the top. There honestly isn't much worse than an invasive plant monoculture. Like yah maybe it's better than an asphalt park? But does the bar need to be on the floor? Thanks for detracting from the already difficult work of convincing people that invasive plants are detrimental.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Relevant username

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Interesting thought, what makes you say perfection creates a bad mental model?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

It is great to have goals and want to improve. Being accepting of incomplete change and process is better. Personally, I like the photos that provide inspiration and some written direction for easily improving a situation that could be similar to mine.

Only accepting perfection tends to drain motivation. It also presumes a lot about ability, uses, values, and resources. It also drives wedges between people.

"I hate ugly monoculture yards" is not an helpful for changing minds as "i love native grass yards. Even a few accent areas are great." I fail at this all of the time. It is important that I get it right some of the time.

As for perfectionism creating poor mental models, the results tend to be fragile. If one must be perfect and able all of the time, it will fail. The models tend to not allow for different abilities, resources, or desires.

I hope this was clear. Cheers

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Some internet group just up and took issue with agriculture. I mean yeah we gotta improve our future and society, but I always go back to a simple sentiment. It's only a relavant issue if it can show up in a video game. So basically the character mechanics we're looking for is a -12 Agility score combined with a religous zeal for unteathering from technology while on life support.