126

Hay grown for cattle consumes nearly half the water drawn from Colorado River, study finds (www.latimes.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archived copies of the article: ghostarchive.org archive.today

The study itself is here

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I do not understand why we don't just plant switch grass and be done with it? It's native to a large swath of the arable land, doesn't require as much (in some areas any) irrigation and it's good for the soil. https://cropwatch.unl.edu/benefits-switchgrass-hay-and-forage

https://utia.tennessee.edu/publications/wp-content/uploads/sites/269/2023/10/SP701-B.pdf

Edit: Also 6.24 is closer to a third of 19.25 than it is a half. Which is still a massive amount of water. Why inflate the numbers by saying nearly a half?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

It's because you have to use your water to keep water rights. Flood irrigating alfalfa is an easy way to use up a lot of water to keep the rights without having to manage more complex farms. The current way that water rights works creates perverse incentives.

load more comments (4 replies)

this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024

126 points (98.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7130 readers

394 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]