this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
104 points (100.0% liked)

movies

22542 readers
42 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's like someone asked ChatGPT to turn the book into a dumb anglo sitcom.

-Every character is emotionally immature, spiteful, and sassy. None of the 'friends' act like friends. None of the characters talk like real people. They're constantly insulting or hitting each other. It's just embarrassing. The actors have nothing to work with.

-All the major twists/reveals are shown in the first two episodes. No suspense, no build-up, no pay-off. Rushed is an understatement.

-Single characters from the book have been unnecessarily split into multiple new characters adding nothing to the story.

-The story is a cosmic horror but comedy and romance have been forced in for no reason whatsoever except as filler, which is even more mind-boggling because they've essentially rushed all of the good stuff in the book to make room for unfunny jokes.

-Apparently they could barely afford any sets and extras, so scenes and locations that are supposed to be bristling with sights and people just feel oddly empty. Even the special effects feel muted. The budget is just weirdly limited, and the show looks much cheaper than the Tencent series.

-Almost all of the science (which is the interesting stuff) has been gutted from this science fiction.

I hate anglo slop. Where is the kino. Tencent pls adapt The Dark Forest.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

i mean yeah if you've never read the books it's pretty cringe to say stuff like that. you don't know how slavery is portrayed in the books, you havent read them.

I can criticize the books for that because I've read them and know how the main character is literally a slave owner, but for all you know I made that up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How is it cringe at all? Learning about the house-elf underclass and calling it dogshit does not require you to imbibe the works of jowling kowling Rowling

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

it's cringe because you literally don't know what you're talking about. like in the literal sense, you do not know of that which you speak. no investigation, no right to speak and so on.

a work featuring a slave class does not make it bad or pro-slavery. harry potter is bad and pro-slavery, but it's only not cringe for me to say that because I've read the books and know what I'm talking about. if you dont know what you're talking about you shouldn't talk about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And I’m saying, you can learn the positive and negative qualities of a work without consuming it directly. We’re talking past each other

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Personally I would never trust the opinion of any person on any book they haven't read, and I would find it embarrassing for them to speak with authority on the topic of a book they haven't read. It doesn't matter what book or what context. Which other books do you express strong opinions about without having read them?