neurodiverse
What is Neurodivergence?
It's ADHD, Autism, OCD, schizophrenia, anxiety, depression, bi-polar, aspd, etc etc etc etc
“neurologically atypical patterns of thought or behavior”
So, it’s very broad, if you feel like it describes you then it does as far as we're concerned
Rules
1.) ableist language=post or comment will probably get removed (enforced case by case, some comments will be removed and restored due to complex situations). repeated use of ableist language=banned from comm and possibly site depending on severity. properly tagged posts with CW can use them for the purposes of discussing them
2.) always assume good faith when dealing with a fellow nd comrade especially due to lack of social awareness being a common symptom of neurodivergence
2.5) right to disengage is rigidly enforced. violations will get you purged from the comm. see rule 3 for explanation on appeals
3.) no talking over nd comrades about things you haven't personally experienced as a neurotypical chapo, you will be purged. If you're ND it is absolutely fine to give your own perspective if it conflicts with another's, but do so with empathy and the intention to learn about each other, not prove who's experience is valid. Appeal process is like appealing in user union but you dm the nd comrade you talked over with your appeal (so make it a good one) and then dm the mods with screenshot proof that you resolved it. fake screenies will get you banned from the site, we will confirm with the comrade you dm'd.
3.5) everyone has their own lived experiences, and to invalidate them is to post cringe. comments will be removed on a case by case basis depending on determined level of awareness and faith
4.) Interest Policing will not be tolerated in any form. Support your comrades in their joy!
Further rules to be added/ rules to be changed based on community input
RULES NOTE: For this community more than most we understand that the clarity and understandability of these rules is very important for allowing folks to feel comfortable, to that end please don't be afraid to be outspoken about amendments and addendums to these rules, as well as any we may have missed
view the rest of the comments
A piece of advice I found helpful is to frame things in terms of expressing how people's actions make you feel. If you frame it as an objective or accusatory thing, people are more likely to argue or get defensive, but if you just say, "when you do X it makes me feel Y" (be specific) then it doesn't leave as much room to argue. The majority of people have an innate drive to avoid making other people feel bad, and a lot of problems can be caused by a lack of awareness rather than malice. But people also have a drive to avoid accusations of wrongdoing to preserve their ego and social status. So if you just bring an issue to their attention and say, "This is how your actions make me feel, do with this information as you will," it can often work better in terms of getting them to change their behavior as compared to being more forceful.
A lot of times when someone doesn't express when something's bothering them, they start ruminating about the person and coming up with all sorts of negative thoughts about them, even if the offender is well-meaning and simply unaware of what they're doing. This can lead to overcorrecting and blowing up in their face, or it can lead to pushing them away without ever giving them a chance. And avoiding it obviously doesn't get them to change their behavior. Counter-intuitively, being assertive can make people like and respect you more because people usually don't want their peers to just be pushovers. It's ok if they're defensive in the moment, not every interaction has to go positively at every moment.
If you follow the advice of framing it in terms of how you feel, it should make it easier to stand your ground. They can make excuses and that's fine, just stick to the core point. "I understand that [their excuse], I'm just letting you know that it makes me feel [emotion]." You know your emotions better than they do, so there's no reason for you to back down on that point. And once you've communicated your feelings, you can drop the subject and move on. Even if it looks like you "lost" the argument in the moment, it can still be effective at changing their behavior.
This advice works well in my experience for voluntary peer-level relationships. If they don't change even when they know it's bothering you, then maybe they're not worth trying to be friends with. But you shouldn't just assume that before you've brought it to their attention and given them a chance to correct their behavior.
How do you deal with involuntary relationships, like someone in a position of authority who you can't easily walk away from, who doesn't give a shit how you feel? Fuck if I know. Do a revolution and abolish hierarchy. In the meantime, you gotta ask someone else because I'm terrible at that. But I also used to be terrible at asserting myself in my personal relationships too and this advice did a lot to help me find the right balance.
This website is what I'm drawing from and I found it to be a great resource for recontextualizing how I thought about the issue. Assertiveness doesn't have to be about putting others down, and done properly it's an important part of a healthy relationship.