this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
123 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3917 readers
30 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
123
Queen's Brian May (beehaw.org)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Alt text: A picture of an older smiling white man with long curly white hair is holding his jacket open, revealing a vest, tie and a gold medal around his neck. The text reads: In 2013, Brian May of Queen bought 157 acres of land that was about to be developed into buildings. He planted trees with the help of volunteers and restored it into a thriving woodland. The area is called "May's Woodland" and has over 100,000 trees growing there.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I'm not sure planting forests instead of housing is always a win for the environment. If the land is in a place where people can take sustainable transportation to their jobs, you should put dense housing there. Or else people will have to drive around your suburban forest.

But in the Brain May case, I have no clue where the forest is

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Good question but it turns out it is not occupying the kind of location you suggested. Being a physicist he probably considered this Map

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm not stating whether he considered it or not, but Brian May being good at one thing (physics) doesn't mean he's good at other things.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

At least two things tho, physics and music

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

Yessss pure lemmycomment

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

I don't know much about the pros Vs cons of woods Vs housing, but I do know that the woods are in an area of the UK where badger culling (ostensibly to reduce levels of bovine TB) is common, and also that the land used to be agricultural. May has a history of campaigning to prevent the killing of British wildlife such as hedgehogs, foxes, badgers and more.

Badgers are especially relevant in this context. They are carriers but bovine-TB is always present in the environment. Whilst there can be transmission between badgers and cows, the majority of cases in farmed cattle are cattle-cattle transmission. Badger culling has not been shown to be necessary or useful in reducing outbreaks of bovine-TB. A better solution is more eyes on agriculture.

I don't know more specifics of this forest, but I'm inclined to take a favourable view of the project in this case, especially as the pro-culling rhetoric around Badger culling irks me. I'm also vaguely aware of a bunch of reforestation projects in the UK and this seems like a sensible place for a forest (with the caveat that I'm a biochemist with only a superficial knowledge of what's going on in ecological activism in the UK atm)