this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
511 points (97.8% liked)

Gaming

20006 readers
7 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I saw this same thing with games like Dead Space 3. They included a cash shop, very likely hard-pushed by some asinine executive. But, you could tell by playing the game, the majority of developers likely tested with that feature off. Was it a fun game? No, but resource starvation was not the reason for that.

Basically it feels like the hands trying to microtransact for singleplayer games are not the same as the ones designing those games to begin with. It still deserves negative attention, just nuance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You are basically betting on the developers being bad at their jobs and not being able to do what they are clearly trying to do, which is making people but microtransactions.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

"They" is far, far, far too encompassing a word. If you've worked in any organization such as this, especially these days, they involve so many different companies (yes, more than one studio works on a game now) with so many different teams all under a publishing studio whose head may never have even played any of this genre of game.

So, a developer in one studio is often just trying to make a good RPG in their debug build (and insists no/light fast travel for world-immersion reasons), and only hears over the grapevine "Wait...they took the complaints about no fast-travel and made it a DLC? That sounds terrible, gamers will hate that." Multiple people across the credits can have varying intentions.