this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
226 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2749 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 108 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (6 children)

The law and its premise is nuts, lets just get that out of the way first.

"The intentional injection, release, or dispersion, by any means, of chemicals, chemical compounds, substances, or apparatus within the borders of this state into the atmosphere with the express purpose of affecting temperature, weather, or the intensity of the sunlight is prohibited," the bill reads.

So on one hand this is a reading about banning any efforts of geoengineering. But modern day airplanes already dump "chemical compounds" into Tennessee airspace today as part of jet engine exhaust. The argument would be "oh, planes are okay because they're not dumping to affect weather even though those gases are affecting the weather via climate change." Doesn't that argument open up license for anyone to dump whatever they want (including geoengineering materials) if they can claim that isn't their primary purpose?

[–] [email protected] 52 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I mean, planes already inject, release, or disperse a lot of chemicals, chemical compounds, substances into the atmosphere, namely CO2 and water, which is why there are contrails.

Did Tennessee just ban airplanes?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 8 months ago (1 children)

“With the express purpose of affecting temperature, weather, or the intensity of sunlight.”

I’m pretty sure they just made it so polluters are fine if the they are just doing it to pollute and don’t give a fuck about climate change

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Seeding clouds for rain definitely affects weather, so I guess that's illegal now?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

*instructions unclear - CO2 emissions violate this new law; henceforth, airplanes are illegal in Tennessee

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Cars are illegal. Breathing is illegal.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So doing it to make the friggin frogs gay is OK?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

gHeY FRooooooooooooooooohggssssss

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Damn.

That is WAAAY moar worser...

You know that tornadoes are already prevented through cloud-alteration, right?

This would criminalize that?


We need to criminalize incompetence-in-authority!!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We need to criminalize incompetence-in-authority!!

I don't think that's possible. There won't be any governments left.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

bOtH SiDeSz!!1

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

wouldnt that be great! some local citizen should sue an airline, using this bill, for affecting the climate.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Reading comprehension: with the express purpose of... That's not the express purpose of those planes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Reading comprehension: with the express purpose of… That’s not the express purpose of those planes.

Critical thinking: the express purpose is whatever the creator/operator of the machine says it is.

Jet engines on a plane's express purpose is to create a high pressure jet of air out one side to propel the craft forward. However, jet engines express purpose can also used to put out oil well fires:

What makes one vs the other? Whatever the creator and operator of the machine decides.

Specifically about geoengineering,

  • There is a company releasing sulfur in geoengineering experiments source.

  • Spraying sulfur is also used in gardening to treat plant disease and pest control. source

So if I say my "express purpose" of releasing sulfur is for plant disease and pest control, even though the other thing it could do would be geoengineering via the same release, I would be in compliance with the wording of the law yet still be geoengineering.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I think also bans "coal-rolling" ... If that wasn't already illegal.