1
1
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
2
1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3
1
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

From https://drsforchoice.org/

BREAKING NEWS

Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice is pleased to announce a significant win for transparency! United States District Court Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk has issued a thoughtful, insightful, and incredible 30-page decision that orders the CDC to release the 7.8 million free text fields from the Covid-19 v-safe program to the public!

The CDC must release hundreds of thousands of these entries each month and all the entries must be released on or before January 15, 2025! CDC had argued that it never had to turn over the entries to the public because it was too burdensome to redact the entries. The Court vehemently disagreed and granted expedited processing, recognizing that “Predictably, the American public now seeks access to COVID-related papers to ensure that relevant government policies were — and still are — supported and justified by the available data.”

The first production of at least 390,000 free text entries is required to be produced by February 15, 2024 and all data received will be posted on this site for the public’s use. The full decision is available here.


Court ruling: https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/texas/txndce/2:2023cv00102/378122/40/0.pdf

Excerpts:

MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION

.. The Motion is GRANTED ..

INTRODUCTION

..

V-safe collected two types of data from millions of Americans: (1) check-the-box options and (2) free-text responses.

Plaintiff seeks production of approximately 7.8 million freetext responses pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”).

..

C. Plaintiff’s FOIA Request

While “Trust the Science” became something of a national slogan, 19 the American public’s trust in science and scientists are at an all-time low.20 It is with this background that Plaintiff aims to further the ideals pledged by the Biden-Harris administration: to “Promote trust, transparency, common purpose, and accountability in our government”21 by making available for public access — and particularly for independent scientific and medical research — all of the relevant health data collected through the V-safe program. As the check-the-box data has already been released, it is the free-text response data Plaintiff seeks.

...

4
1
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

1)The new information was released(where?) as a result of a January court order from U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk. It follows V-Safe data previously detailed by civil rights attorney Aaron Siri in a 2022 roundtable hosted by Republican U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin.

That data(which data?) revealed that 800,000 of the system’s 10 million participants, or approximately 7.7 percent, reported needing medical care after COVID injection. “Twenty-five percent of those people needed emergency care or were hospitalized, and another 48 percent sought urgent care,” Siri said at the time. “Also, another 25 percent on top of the 7.7 percent reported being unable to work or go to school.”

2)The CDC was forced to publish the information following a court order. These reports are in addition to the shocking number of cases already revealed by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The revelations come after the federal government undertook a three-year-long intensive campaign to delegitimize such talk as “harmful misinformation.” The reports were submitted to the CDC’s V-Safe reporting system. Most of the patients in the reports had suffered from heart failure, miscarriages, seizures, unconsciousness, Bell’s palsy (partial and temporary facial paralysis), and more as a result of the Covid mRNA injections.

Court case ruling: https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/texas/txndce/2:2023cv00102/378122/40/0.pdf

See also: https://dockets.justia.com/docket/texas/txndce/2:2023cv00102/378122

I didn't find the actual CDC reporting on it

sources

5
1
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

(EN) RKI-Files (Robert Koch Institute) are internal protocols of Germany’s Federal Health Agency. They were obtained through legal action under the Freedom of Information Act. The files show that politicians ordered the experts to make up stories and narratives so as to support the government’s preconceived measures.

(NL) het Coronaschandaal in Duitsland en de achtergronden achter de RKI ( Robert Koch Instituut ) files

RKI files zijn hier te downloaden https://my.hidrive.com/share/2-hpbu3.3u#$/

Original full video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHJI9TK9g7Y

6
1
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
7
1
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

In week 13 starten de heren, in tegenstelling tot andere weken, met een blik op wat komen gaat. Willem is nog onderweg en kan daardoor helaas niet aanwezig zijn bij de opname van het volledige weekoverzicht, maar niet getreurd! Aanstaande zaterdag, 30 maart, staat de gehele uitzending voor jullie klaar.

In dit iets beknoptere overzicht behandelen Jeroen en Willem de meest urgente nieuwtjes van de week. Verwacht duiding en de laatste updates over onder meer de RKI-files, de ophef rondom Thierry Baudet, de gebeurtenissen in Moskou, de rechtszaak van 28 maart en Baltimore.

8
1
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

🚹BREAKING: FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history.

This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.

Thank you @BoydenGrayPLLC for your excellent counsel. @drpaulmarik1 @RobertApter1 @Covid19Critical

Source: https://twitter.com/MdBreathe/status/1771023714584273015

See also about the lawsuit itself: https://lemmy.staphup.nl/post/56772

9
1
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

A United States Navy Medical Service Corps whistleblower recently disclosed information from the Department of Defense that reportedly shows a major increase in military pilots with heart-related issues after the implementation of the COVID-19 vaccination.

Navy Medical Service Corps Lt. Ted Macie, who is an active-duty officer, a Navy health administrator, and a medical recruiter, shared the information Monday in a video on X, formerly Twitter. Macie presented his claims over concerns that have repeatedly been emphasized by his wife, Mara Macie, who is currently running for Florida’s 5th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives.

In his video, Ted Macie claimed that the U.S. military has experienced a major increase in heart-related issues with helicopter and fixed-wing pilots. Macie claimed that Defense Department data shows a 937% increase in heart failure, a 152% increase in cardiomyopathy, a 69% increase in ischemic heart disease, a 62% increase in pulmonary heart disease, a 36% increase in hypertensive disease, and a 63% increase in other forms of heart disease compared to the five-year average before 2022.

10
1
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

In the “Weekly Overview with Willem and Jeroen”, February 11th 2023, Willem and Jeroen discuss what happened to flu registrations, gain-of-function with influenza, the PCR-test and the involvement of Erasmus Univerasity in this. English subtitels Weekoverzicht met Jeroen en Willem- Week 6 2023 (videowaarheid.nl)

11
1
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Dr Tina Peers, UK. Eyes, Heart, cancer, brain. Good summary of the Destruction.

12
1
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Er is dus een landelijk media verbod tegen Willem Engel ingesteld (zonder rechtspraak!) nadat hij (tijdens colona) 1x in een debat is geweest op TV.đŸ€”

Slecht nieuws brengen over hem doet media volop, maar ze mogen hem nooit interviewen?! Luister wat er gebeurde bij wie t per ongeluk wel deden..

https://youtu.be/TLqmnEObiu4?t=2998 (heb m ingesprongen)

BlckBx.tv blackbox tv

13
1
Post viral syndrome data (www.youtube.com)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
14
1
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Vergelijking van de gezondheidstoestand van gevaccineerde versus niet-gevaccineerde kinderen

Steeds weer worden we gebombardeerd met boodschappen en slogans over de enorme bijdrage die de vaccinaties hebben geleverd om ons te beschermen tegen de risico’s van een resem besmettelijke en gevaarlijke ziektes. De propaganda over de talloze levens die zouden worden gered dankzij de vaccinatie-inspanningen is alomtegenwoordig.

We vinden ze op de websites van de nationale overheden, van de Europese instanties en van de Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie. We vinden ze in de inleidende paragrafen van de wetenschappelijke artikelen. We horen ze op radio en tv, we lezen ze in tijdschriften en persartikels. Maar klopt deze aanname wel? Zijn de inentingen een zegen voor de gezondheid van onze kinderen en volwassenen?

Eigenaardig genoeg vindt men op de officiële websites nooit verwijzingen naar vergelijkende studies die hierover zouden zijn uitgevoerd. Mocht het inderdaad zo zijn dat gevaccineerde kinderen en volwassenen een betere gezondheid hebben dan ongevaccineerde, dan zou dat toch heel gemakkelijk aan te tonen zijn aan de hand van vergelijkend onderzoek. Merkwaardig genoeg vindt men nergens enig spoor van zulke vergelijkende studies. Onze overheden en wetenschappers vinden het blijkbaar niet nodig om zulke studies uit te voeren.

Maar zulke studies bestaan wel degelijk. Alleen komen ze tot net het omgekeerde besluit als wat de officiĂ«le boodschappen ons vertellen. Alle vergelijkende studies komen tot de conclusie dat de niet-gevaccineerden een betere gezondheid hebben dan de gevaccineerden. Vaccinatie helpt wel tegen het risico van welbepaalde ziektekiemen, maar het verzwakt de gezondheid en de weerbaarheid tegen alle andere aandoeningen en risico’s.

De Powerpoint en de video is te downloaden. Zie nr 25 https://vaccinatieschade.be/presentaties

15
1
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
16
1
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The Vaccine Interview- Tonight 2.23.24 - Steve Kirsch ~ Tucker Carlson. How many people died from the C.O.V.I.D shot? Do vaccines actually cause autism? Steve Kirsch has looked at the data. Feb 23, 2024

Mirror From : Tucker Carlson Tonight

https://TuckerCarlson.com

https://Twitter.com/TuckerCarlson

17
1
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Feb 26, 2024

Where to find the paper: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-springer-nature-cureus-journal

--

The Workbook: https://bozmd.com/product/ketocontinuum-consistently-keto-diet-for-life-paperback-edition/

Thanks for checking out the Dr. Boz Channel. See links below resources & recommendations.

Tune in Tuesday nights, 6PM Eastern/5PM Central to watch me Live! We improve health - One ketone at a time.

18
1
Eindelijk begint het tij te keren (www.stevenschrijft.be)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Eindelijk begint het tij te keren

Afgelopen weekend doorbrak de Vlaamse media eindelijk de stilte rondom de olifant in de kamer: de corona-injecties en hun bijwerkingen. In een voor hen toch wel gedurfde zet bracht VTM Nieuws een uitgebreide reportage naar aanleiding van de resultaten van een grootschalig onderzoek onder maar liefst 99 miljoen gevaccineerden. Dit onderzoek bracht vier ernstige bijwerkingen aan het licht, een onthulling die voorheen onbespreekbaar leek. Als je dit enkele jaren geleden durfde neer te pennen op sociale media werd je dadelijk gestraft met een ban van enkele dagen tot een maand en het bericht werd sneller verwijderd dan Marc Van Ranst kritische stemmen blokkeert op Twitter. Het narratief was immers al enkele jaren dat de vaccins veilig en efficiënt waren. Dit was geen leugen, het waren twee leugens. Uiteraard is dit helemaal geen fijn nieuws dat er zoveel mensen zeer ziek werden van deze injecties. Het is echter wel belangrijk om dit te brengen zodat dezelfde fouten in de toekomst niet meer gemaakt worden.

Het nieuws dat werd gepresenteerd, is echter slechts het topje van de ijsberg. Terwijl de media nog steeds benadrukken dat bijwerkingen zeldzaam zijn en dat massale vaccinatie een goede zaak was, beweren echt kritische wetenschappers al jaren dat deze campagne waarschijnlijk de grootste medische fout ooit is. Helaas worden deze wetenschappers nog steeds weggezet als verspreiders van desinformatie.

Er zijn echter ook steeds meer gevaccineerde artsen en wetenschappers die hun fouten erkennen. Zeker wanneer zij zelf de vaccins met overtuiging hebben genomen en aan hun kinderen gegeven is het de moeite waard om te luisteren wanneer zij spreken. Ze kunnen immers niet worden afgeschilderd als anti-vaxxers. Dit weekend was er opnieuw een arts, Dr Annette Bosworth (beter bekend als Dr. Boz), die naar buiten trad en de video die ze op haar YouTube kanaal brengt is zeker de moeite om eens te bekijken. Omdat de kans groot is dat het op sociale media nog steeds wordt gecensureerd breng ik het hier vandaag op mijn website. Ik denk dat het zeker de moeite is om dit te delen met vrienden of familieleden die nog steeds geloven in het narratief van de afgelopen jaren. U mag in de comments zeker ook andere interessante video’s over deze problematiek delen die de moeite waard zijn om te bekijken.

19
1
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
20
1
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

FLCCC Alliance Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Pierre Kory, joined Jan Jeffcoat on The National Desk (TND) and discussed the lingering side effects of Long COVID and Long Vax, and how the repurposed drugs, ivermectin and Low-Dose Naltrexone (LDN), are being used to treat spike-protein induced diseases.

“There was a disinformation campaign directed towards ivermectin. The drug has been unfairly maligned. It’s a mainstay of our treatment, not only for acute COVID but even Long COVID and Long Vax.”

To learn more, please join us for FLCCC’s Weekly Webinar on February 21, 2024. Dr. Paul Marik and Scott Marsland, LNC-P will discuss the topic, ‘Lingering Long COVID and Long Vax.’

Register for FLCCC Weekly Webinar:

https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_2CY5VGh7Rk6NeDPZOpzKyQ#/registration

Learn more:

Beyond the Shots: Decoding Long Vax Syndrome Symptoms

I-RECOVER: Post-Vaccine Treatment

21
1
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The documents in question stem from a report at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, which were hidden in a top secret shared drive.

DARPA is an agency under the U.S. Department of Defense in charge of facilitating research in technology with potential military applications.

Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.

The report states that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018, seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the basis gain of function research moratorium.

According to the documents, NAIAD, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, went ahead with the research in Wuhan, China and at several sites across the U.S.

Dr. Fauci has repeatedly maintained, under oath, that the NIH and NAIAD have not been involved in gain of function research with the EcoHealth Alliance program. But according to the documents obtained by Project Veritas which outline why EcoHealth Alliance’s proposal was rejected, DARPA certainly classified the research as gain of function.

“The proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function (GoF) research,” a direct quote from the DARPA rejection letter.

Major Murphy’s report goes on to detail great concern over the COVID-19 gain of function program, the concealment of documents, the suppression of potential curatives, like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, and the mRNA vaccines.

Project Veritas reached out to DARPA for comment regarding the hidden documents and spoke with the Chief of Communications, Jared Adams, who said, “It doesn’t sound normal to me,” when asked about the way the documents were shrouded in secrecy. “If something resides in a classified setting, then it should be appropriately marked,” Adams said. “I’m not at all familiar with unmarked documents that reside in a classified space, no.”

In a video breaking this story published on Monday night, Project Veritas CEO, James O’Keefe, asked a foundational question to DARPA:

“Who at DARPA made the decision to bury the original report? They could have raised red flags to the Pentagon, the White House, or Congress, which may have prevented this entire pandemic that has led to the deaths of 5.4 million people worldwide and caused much pain and suffering to many millions more.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci has not yet responded to a request for comment on this story.

22
1
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The worrying fact is: "we don't have herd immunity"

23
1
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Transplacental Transmission of the COVID-19 Vaccine mRNA: Evidence from Placental, Maternal and Cord Blood Analyses Post-Vaccination; American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jan. 24, 2024 (journal pre-proof).

COVID-19 immunization products (“vaccines”) were supposed to stay at the injection site. However, according to a New York University study, vaccine messenger RNA (mRNA) and coronavirus spike protein can reach placentas and umbilical cords in pregnant women.

This study involved just two patients. Patient 1, a 34-year-old pregnant woman, received a Pfizer two-shot primary round and two boosters (one Pfizer, one Moderna), with the last dose administered two days before delivering by cesarean section. Investigators collected samples of her placenta, blood and cord blood post-delivery.

Patient 2 was 33 and received two Pfizer doses, the last 10 days before her vaginal delivery. Only placental samples were available from this patient.

Vaccine mRNA was detected in both placentas. Spike protein was found in the placenta of Patient 2 but not Patient 1. mRNA from the vaccine was found in the cord and maternal blood of Patient 1.

The authors concluded: “These two cases demonstrate, for the first time, the ability of the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA to penetrate the fetal-placental barrier and reach the intrauterine environment.”

24
1
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Long Covid, vaccines may cause disease and death: Chula, Rangsit

Long Covid-19 infections and multiple Covid-19 vaccinations might let hidden diseases surface, weaken immunity and lead to cancer and brain disorders, according to authorities from Chulalongkorn and Rangsit universities.The warning came from Prof Dr Thiravat Hemachudha, director of the Thai Red Cross Emerging Infectious Diseases Health Science Centre at Chulalongkorn University, and Panthep Puapongphan, dean of the College of Oriental Medicine at Rangsit University.

They stated on Sunday that symptoms that remained longer than three months after Covid-19 infection were called "long Covid" and included symptoms concerning the heart, lungs and nerves as well as the inflammation of skin, tendons, fibrous tissue, muscles and joints.

They could also lead to cancer and might spark outbreaks of illnesses that lay dormant, such as herpes, they said.

Prof Dr Thiravat and Mr Panthep stated that there were efforts to conceal data about the people affected and killed by vaccinations, and the official number of people affected by vaccinations was thus unrealistically low.

Consequently, many people were unaware that vaccinations affected them and they could not find proper treatment.

They also said that the mortality rate of Thais rose from its levels before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. They urged for investigation to find out if it was related to vaccinations. They did not give relevant numbers.

Studies in other countries showed that Covid-19 vaccination killed some people who suffered damage to their systems including their heart, blood and respiratory systems, they claimed.

In addition, the Faculty of Medicine at Chulalongkorn University found nearly 100 Covid-19 cases who were vaccinated had the inflammation and protein conditions that indicate brain disorders, they said, with some already showing brain disorder symptoms.

Prof Dr Thiravat and Mr Panthep also quoted Ramathibodi Hospital as reporting a research project by the Faculty of Medicine at Mahidol University that after their third jabs of Covid-19 vaccination, some people had weak T-Cell immunity. It meant that excessive vaccinations might weaken immunity, they said.

The true data should be revealed, they said, to let people make informed decisions on their vaccination, they said.


25
1
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Woensdag(14 Feb 2024) werd een zeer controversiële wet door het Franse lagerhuis gejast. De wet criminaliseert in één klap alle mensen die kritiek hebben op mRNA-behandeling.

De draconische wet, die stilletjes en zonder debat is aangenomen, maakt het mogelijk om eenieder die adviseert tegen het gebruik van een experimentele mRNA-gentherapie tot drie jaar gevangenisstraf en 45.000 euro boete te geven.

De wet is ingevoerd in de strijd tegen ‘sektarische uitwassen’ en zou bedoeld zijn om ‘pseudo-therapeuten’ veroordeeld te krijgen.

Disproportionele en ongerechtvaardigde aanval

In eerste instantie werd het wetsvoorstel verworpen, maar na wat tekstuele aanpassingen werd het alsnog aangenomen, vrijwel zonder debat, schrijft onderzoeksjournalist Sonia Elijah.

Nadat het lagerhuis had ingestemd met het wetsvoorstel, uitten critici hun zorgen op sociale media, waaronder ook bioloog Annelise Bocquet:

Politiek filosoof David Thunder schreef op X dat dit anti-wetenschappelijk is en Frankrijk nog verder in de richting van totalitarisme duwt.

Zelfs de Franse Raad van State sprak zich uit tegen de wet. Volgens het orgaan is de wet een ‘disproportionele en ongerechtvaardigde aanval’ op het uiten van afwijkende meningen.

Het ‘Pfizer-amendement’

Politicus Florian Philippot, de voormalige rechterhand van Marine Le Pen, sprak van het ‘Pfizer-amendement’.

Onder president Macron werd in de zomer van 2021 een medisch apartheidssysteem geĂŻntroduceerd. Mensen die een bioscoop, winkel of restaurant wilden bezoeken, konden alleen naar binnen met een vaccinatiepaspoort of een negatief testbewijs.

Dat is de strategie

Macron zei ook dat hij ongevaccineerden het leven zuur wilde maken. Hij wilde ongeprikten ‘graag’ dwarszitten om hen toch over de streep te trekken een vaccin te halen. “Ongevaccineerden wil ik echt op hun zenuwen werken, tot het eind aan toe. Dat is de strategie.” Macrons woorden leidden tot een storm van kritiek.

Bij een volgende pandemie kunnen ongevaccineerden dus niet alleen worden dwarsgezeten, maar ook in de cel worden gegooid, aldus Elijah.

bron: https://www.ninefornews.nl/in-frankrijk-is-kritiek-op-mrna-injecties-voortaan-strafbaar-tot-3-jaar-cel-en-45-000-euro-boete/

view more: next â€ș

Covid19💉 etc

59 readers
1 users here now

Releted Info on the c19 scam

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS