zepplenzap

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

If this technology is so great, why does the site not show any before / after examples? Let alone demonstrating that it does what he claims?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Counterpoint to lightbulb planned obsolescence: https://youtu.be/zb7Bs98KmnY?si=h-i2U3Q8YE5tHW7G

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have chosen wisely

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

More then you ever thought you needed to know about lightbulbs! (Including the fact that inconsistent light bulbs are not vacuumes, they just have no oxygen, so they heat up via normal connection)

https://youtu.be/zb7Bs98KmnY

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It has been years since I wrote any SQL, so I may just be missing something but:

Why is the "As it could be" example for the second example using sub selects?!

Especially the one in the where clause where they are selecting two tables that they already joined in the from clause?

And wouldn't it be quicker to join the review table and use a group by?