vinylshrapnel

Just because the number of offenders is negligible doesn’t mean they should continue to exercise that right after they’ve abused that same right to the detriment of others.

I would argue committing voter fraud or election fraud is grounds for stripping away one’s voting rights. The person has proven they do not value other people’s voting rights by trying to subvert otherwise fair elections and should therefore forfeit their own voting rights. That’s really the only reason voting rights should ever be stripped though.

If you’ve served your complete sentence for a non-violent crime, you should get your voting rights back, unless said crime was related to voting. Likewise, if you are convicted of a violent crime involving a firearm, you should forfeit your second amendment rights for life.

This is way bigger than you think it is.

For reference, that is an area larger than South Carolina and nearly as large as Maine.

I’d rather it be in the background than completely interrupting the game every five or ten minutes.

Sure but I’m not watching banners. I’m watching the action in the field. They aren’t intrusive like actual commercials are.

Sounds like the jealous ex wife is being used and exploited to attempt to throw a Hail Mary to get the case thrown out.

I really hope it’s bullshit, but it’s going to a hearing. Hopefully it’s just an idiotic delay tactic. https://apple.news/AwW_1rTUOQx63y_9SdhIasw

Not if you watch soccer. 45 minutes of non stop game time followed by five minutes of commercials, five minutes of halftime analysis, five more minutes of commercials, then 45 minutes of more uninterrupted game time. Even with added time regular games don’t take more than two hours and only ten minutes of it is commercials. Even if every commercial at halftime was a gambling commercial, it would only take up 10.5% of the airtime at most. Half time bathroom break could take care of most of those ads. Plus you still have most of the day to enjoy something else.

Spin the board!