tormeh

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Maybe the same as with drugs in sports: Self-experimentation can be an expedient shortcut, and scientists are often very competitive people. If results obtained through self-experimentation are rewarded, many scientists would be tempted to do it. Contrary to doping in sport, however, in science you need to at least do something different each time for it to be publication-worthy. That institutes a big skill floor and considerable risk, so I think a self-experimentation epidemic is unlikely. Generally I still think self-experimentation is good, precisely because it's such a shortcut.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I'm sure it's possible, but it's not going to come for free nor will it be immediate

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly. Let's hope we get to have another bad US election rather than this being the last one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doesn't all authority already lie with the USA? If we're going to be real, I mean. I'm sure France thinks otherwise but let's be real: NATO was always the "Uncle Sam will protect Europe from Russia"-treaty.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Not a lot. The British weapons are reliant on US maintenance. Won't be credible for long if the US doesn't support them.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I hope we'll be able to do this again. There are worse alternatives.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

South Korea gets nukes in 3, 2, 1...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Nobody wants to be on the naughty-list of a person this powerful. Even if he loses, the Republican party and all its office-holding members will still to some degree answer to him. He's not someone you want to pick a fight with unless you are willing to sacrifice something.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

That's illegal, unfortunately. Only qccredited investors can invest into private companies. There should be a lower limit on that rule, say $100 or something, so naive investors could invest play sums in potentially shady stuff. But there isn't, so you can't.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Harrier Dubois, is that you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

I think it theoretically can't be done. The protocol allows anyone to query for posts, and it has to work that way unless you want to move ActivityPub federation to an invite-only system. On most servers I think browsing while being logged out is sufficient, just like on pre-Musk Twitter.

110
Dickmann knew (discuss.tchncs.de)
 
 

The ChatGPT voice prompt is surprisingly relevant to human conversations

 
456
PSA incoming (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 

I find it so hard to find anyone compatible. I’m basically slowing down my dating efforts because it just makes me miserable. Are there any success stories out there? Common personality types that pair surprisingly well? Anything?

view more: next ›