src

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, I'm glad. I wouldn't want to engage with someone as condescending and rude as you, either. The less people talk with you the better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What's what suppose to mean? Discounting his opinion because his username has the word Eskimo in it?

Just because something references race doesn't mean it's racist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not everything is related to skin color Jesus. The world isn't so black and white.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What a condescending, bratty thing to say. You don't have to belittle people just because you disagree with them. You can have respectful, mature conversation :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is from page 26 of A Game of Thrones by George R. R. Martin.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Anyone can be sexually abused, not just underage people.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why reply if you have nothing to add?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So it's acceptable for AIs to generate these sorts of outputs, as long as they aren't shared online? Sure, the outputs aren't very tasteful, but they're certainly not illegal by any stretch.

Why do you think the government should intervene, and what you would even expect them to do? No laws are being broken.

If you somehow forbid AIs from generating this through a national law just because it's offensive, it'll open to floodgates to ban 1,000 other things that are offensive. Where do you draw the line? Ban this content from websites like TikTok, sure. But it doesn't make sense to regulate this from the AIs themselves.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So you would support government limiting an individual's right to run software on their computer because you don't agree with what the software outputs?

That's absolute nonsense. The entire premise of these machine learning models is that they accept any arbitrary input, you would want to neuter that?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It's sad that you're getting down voted for this, because you're absolutely right. These lemmy communities are already turning out to be a left-leaning echo chamber, this thread is a perfect example. Any opinion that differs from the left is blocked or downvoted or argued against endlessly.

OP asks a completely reasonable question in good faith, and hundreds of people come to attack him for thinking differently than they do.

People straight up mock him for no reason. The left loves to paint the right as being hateful, but I'm only seeing the left being hateful on here.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

With all due respect, you're very condescending and snobby. You act like you know his beliefs better than he does, that superiority complex looks ugly on you.

You think insulting people for having certain views is going to be helpful in this dialogue? You think mocking someone who's having a conversation with you in good faith is productive?

Grow up, quit being so smug and childish.

view more: next ›