skillissuer

i'm not. just because he's an underdog here means that you're gonna ignore all the harms of generative ai up to this day? it's like complaining that big oil stole the idea of adding tetraethyllead to gasoline from you and you got no profits from that as a result

at the same time in some cash-fueled thinktank in dc:

founder mode derogatory? [flagged]

i'm not a lawyer and i've typed it up after 4h of sleep, trying to make sense of what tf were they thinking. they're not bagging up money, they're stealing all data they can, so it's less direct and it'd depend on how that data (unstructured, public) will be valued at. then, what a coincidence, their proprietary thing made something useful commercially, or so were they thinking. sbf went to court with less

it just clicked for me but idk if it makes sense: openai nonprofit status could be used later (inevitably in court) to make research clause of fair use work. they had it when training their models and that might have been a factor why they retained it, on top of trying to attract actual skilled people and not just hypemen and money

i stared into abyss again and he can't grasp why flywheels for energy storage don't work while trying to make happen a startup that sells hardware

"qm and fluid dynamics are easy" lol

mullenweg is a rentseeker in latest wordpress saga, look up last stubsack and one before that

there's more

or you could use something like qrencode that already is a thing and pipe it to image viewer of your choice

yeah which might it be

he's also lying box understander

(idk why these screenshots get stretched to entire width available sometimes and sometimes they don't)

there's a lot of this

we had these since manhattan project. sit tf down

i think we have different standards on being coherent

finding and looking up information you need effectively is a skill that is both very useful and i don't think it's taught explicitly, it's a byproduct of being taught how to do research more generally. slapping a lying box in its place is not a substitute

idk what to exactly put there, moat is still an obstacle even in modern context, but assault on a castle with a moat using modern weaponry would be hilariously one-sided. you can suppress defenders with something, use a bridge layer to get inside the moat, then let combat engineers do their shenanigans to "open" castle one way or another. or you can use helis to do the same, or you can just level it all with artillery or airstrike or maybe even loads of ATGMs

that said it's not completely useless. moats but dry were used as a part of fixed fortifications in ww1 quite successfully. freshly invented electrified barbed wire fence and machine guns made them quite hard to pass, especially if you are, say, a peasant from tula oblast born in 1898 that has never seen powerline before. i think the last proper moat use in large-scale warfare happened during iran-iraq war, in battle of the marshes, when iraqis flooded previously dry area known as fish lake and put underwater coils of barbed wire and high-voltage cables. defensive tactic used there was to shoot at assaulting iranians to make them abandon or fall out of their boats or amphibious vehicles, then when they were in the water high voltage lines were energized. iranians eventually crossed the marshes entirely using speedboats. maybe it's not that outdated considering that last recored bayonet charge happened in 2004 (by brits in iraq). ymmv

i see your twitter engineer and i raise you elite promptfondler