2
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I've read an article which describes how to simulate the close ports as open in Linux by eBPF. That is, an outside port scanner, malicious actor, will get tricked to observe that some ports, or all of them, are open, whereas in reality they'll be closed.

How could this be useful for the owner of a server? Wouldn't it be better to pretend otherwise: open port -> closed?

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

re-read my question carefully

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

"I don’t want to encypt them in-place because I’ll be uploading them onto a server, copying them on an external drive."

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

I don't want to encypt them in-place because I'll be uploading them onto a server, copying them on an external drive.

1
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Namely, de-facto, or one of, in Linux. Mature. No GUI. Open-source and free.

What is it? GPG or anything else?

For a separate file(s), or directory(ies), and not for the entire disk or partition.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

that's why you should be logged out of Google and also delete your cookies periodically :) To reset the memory of Google

[-] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

Nothing. But mentioning it, don't forget to mention Youtube as well.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As if Youtube didn't promote conspiracy theories and almost Nazi rhetorics that serve the country it's based in. They do, which they don't call as such. Everything else they'll call conspiracy theories and propaganda.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

the fact that you like it doesn't make best or even decent in terms of privacy

11
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Our sanctions full of holes at play, guys. Even in LNG

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

. Some of them could also be implemented with native messaging.

Some? Or all?

uBlockOrigin would still loose some of its features and capabilities nonetheless, even if a sub-set of them could be implemented in other ways. Not?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not in the direct war - correct. But in a proxy one. But even in it we haven't been to even match Russia's weapon production and which we have also admitted. By the margin of 3-7 times.

But that's about weapons. What about economy? Geopolitics? No major blow-ups for Russia, if not the opposite, either.

sapporo

joined 2 months ago