nsrxn

the only peer reviewed source you provided spends as much time detailing risks as it does explaining potential benefits, and it's based on a single case study.

this assumes the animals are slaughtered for pet food, but they aren't. the meat fed to pets is generally the worst cuts of the animal and the offal, meaning that feeding this to pets is a conservation of resources.

At least six billion land-based “food animals” would also be spared from slaughter annually

I doubt it

The reason why PETA gets a lot of negative media attention is

there is more than one reason.

not any more

You’re on the block list now.

oh thank God.

calling me names doesn't change the facts

this is more hypothesizing. it's not proof of your claim.

your accusation of sealioning is also bad faith.

then make that case instead of claiming they'd fold someone.

your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith.

this isn't proof. it's a hypothesis.

that's not a testament of intelligence