nothingness

at https://hexdocs.pm/open_api_spex/3.2.0/readme.html there's a definition of a module User

defmodule MyApp.Schemas do
  alias OpenApiSpex.Schema

  defmodule User do
    @behaviour OpenApiSpex.Schema
    @derive [Jason.Encoder]
    @schema %Schema{
      title: "User",
      description: "A user of the app",
      type: :object,
      properties: %{
        id: %Schema{type: :integer, description: "User ID"},
        name:  %Schema{type: :string, description: "User name"},
        email: %Schema{type: :string, description: "Email address", format: :email},
        inserted_at: %Schema{type: :string, description: "Creation timestamp", format: :datetime},
        updated_at: %Schema{type: :string, description: "Update timestamp", format: :datetime}
      },
      required: [:name, :email],
      example: %{
        "id" => 123,
        "name" => "Joe",
        "email" => "[email protected]"
      }
      "x-struct": __MODULE__
    }
    def schema, do: @schema
    defstruct Map.keys(@schema.properties)
  end

In order to avoid re-describing it like that for Open API Specs whilst having already done so for Ecto, is it possible to combine the two definitions in a single module somehow? That is, my Ecto schema User would serve its purpose for Open API Specs too. With some required tweaks.

And if I do combine them, won't this mess up with the methods of the 2 modules and other things?

Why do Braizeiros NEVER under a question like this:

Há chá aqui?
Há wifi aqui?
Há alguma mesa livre aqui?

Never. Never. Never.

I'm aware of tem ... ?. I'm aware that I could ask vende-se ...?. But Há [...] aqui? is a valid, normal, simple Portuguese phrase which must be understood ANYONE who speaks it.

What's the matter?

There's no usual "That's because Putin is in panic!!!!!" in the article, so I'm adding it here -- just in case.

How will Europe and US respond?

I'm a developer.

I've already added payments in Solana and ETH onto my website and now want to add ones in Monero.

So I'll generate a 100 wallets that will be assigned to each user. How will I checking their balances? Will it be possible at all, without my own node, or with a third-party API only? Or will I have to run a node?

The key is to be able to do it automatically, in a web app.

On one server I run MailCow and other - Postfix and Dovecot. I also have a script that sends emails. For the moment I run a script from my local laptop and it works fine.

If I, however, ran a script on each of the 2 servers themselves, I'd be able to connect to the MTAs and get authenticated simpler.

How would I do it?

What would I have to set up, what permissions grant?

I'm trying to build iwlwifi module manually and for my needs.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/iwlwifi-fixes.git/tree/net/wireless/

When I run Makefile as make, I get:

subcmd-util.h: In function ‘xrealloc’:
subcmd-util.h:58:31: error: pointer ‘ptr’ may be used after ‘realloc’ [-Werror=use-after-free]
   58 |                         ret = realloc(ptr, 1);
      |                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
subcmd-util.h:52:21: note: call to ‘realloc’ here
   52 |         void *ret = realloc(ptr, size);
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
subcmd-util.h:56:23: error: pointer ‘ptr’ may be used after ‘realloc’ [-Werror=use-after-free]
   56 |                 ret = realloc(ptr, size);
      |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
subcmd-util.h:52:21: note: call to ‘realloc’ here
   52 |         void *ret = realloc(ptr, size);
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[4]: *** [/data/iwlwifi-fixes/tools/build/Makefile.build:97: /data/iwlwifi-fixes/tools/objtool/help.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [Makefile:59: /data/iwlwifi-fixes/tools/objtool/libsubcmd-in.o] Error 2
make[2]: *** [Makefile:63: /data/iwlwifi-fixes/tools/objtool/libsubcmd.a] Error 2
make[1]: *** [Makefile:69: objtool] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:1349: tools/objtool] Error 2

Why is it? How to fix it?

Whenever I encounter the label "made in EU", "Germany", "Estonia", "France" ...... in the footer of a web project, which implies enhanced data-protection, apparently, I wonder:

How can it be so? There're some data-protection laws, yes. But one can't control a hosting provider 24h/day. One can't know whether an employer there copies all data on his memory-drivers.

Can't the police, if need be, seize a server as easily as it would in any other country on Earth?

Don't the majority of all of countries in Europe share information with the intelligence of US by the agreements of the 5 eyes, 9 eyes, 14 eyes? Whereas the 2nd and 3rd world countries don't.

How is it better than a label "made in South Africa", "Thailand", "Costa Rica", "Egypt", "Kuwait"?

I can see how "made in Germany" or EU makes a project worse in terms of privacy and data-protection. How could it make it better, though?

I want to take aт existing, a standard or one of the popular ones, WiFi driver for Linux and tweak it. I'll inroduce a whitelist into it. That is, to the consumer a driver will show the networks from a whitelist only ignoring all other ones.

It's a PoC. I want to implement it as simply as possible.

Can this be implemented? And how, in a high level?

Can a custom token be priced however much the owner may want? Can the author put the price of $10k/unit on a token?

The question isn't whether or not it'll then be selling.

Is there any library for the queueing mechanism?

What's used by the most - Cron? But a task or rather script executed by Cron won't access to the context of an application. Meaning, a task will have be an independent unit. Whereas I want is a library to use inside a project such that it'll have access to everything.

Anything similar to Sidekiq exist in Rust?