It is different from carbon credits. I don't think you get a rebate from not emitting. If the cost is passed onto the consumer when there are good alternatives with less carbon, they will be out-competed. One thing with few alternatives is transportation, which low-income households tend to spend more on.
I've changed this on all my terminals and I'm not ashamed of it.
If you intended RFC to be a reference to IETF RFCs you should now it originally stood for Requests for Comments before simply being referred to as RFCs. (link) I didn't have to read your document in detail, but it seems reasonable and well thought out.
Maybe as practice you could have the subject facing more to the side, and move the viewer closer. That way it'll be easier to notice if the features are really placed on a sphere, like if the eyes are different sizes. The hair has lots of potential depth, but perhaps a hat with flaps and a sawtooth pattern along the edge would be easier to apply perspective to and see if it's correct.
At first I thought it was something about it being a worst case scenario for compression algorithms, costing bandwidth.
I think bandwidth and data caps are a hindrance to this. Looking on the bright side, at least something would have to be better in this dystopian future.
Got this by using "force RTL layout direction for all locales" in Android developer options:
So that's the only meaning of the teletubby and the angry looks, that's it's the odd one out? Not that it's childish/naive/dumb or bad?
These are clickable in the post, but not in the comments. And they go directly to that instance.
Edit: Oh. I just checked the source and it seems they were manually linked? Or converted by Mastadon before Lemmy received them?
Yes, there's a B after the name in the web interface.
I was able to enable it on stable by toggling browser.urlbar.showSearchTerms.featureGate
Edit: Nevermind, it doesn't work for custom engines, which suggests that it's a separate implementation from mobile?