mathemachristian

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Pretty please don't separate the newborn from it's mom right after birth only to kill it later and confine the mom in a tiny space and forcibly milk her dry.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

In my case my hexbear account is an alt of my lemm.ee account

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago

My point was that there was much more good faith discussion from hexbear than from OP, I think the posts you copied here illustrate that nicely.

Also

Poor oppressed Putin!

shows how little you understand these arguments, the argument you post after that is meant to illustrate how Putin is an oppressor, not a oppressed or a speaker of the oppressed.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (5 children)

They're detailed, they're sourced and they give a coherent explanation. You can call them crock or whatever but it's something you can actually argue against. None of this applies to the responses OP gave.

Also you're really not understanding what is being said about the nazis in ukraine, namely that they are in power and control of the military. Which is an argument Im not gonna get into since I don't know enough about it, but there is more to it than the "ukraine is imperfect because it has nazis and this is enough justification case closed. " argument you claim is being put forth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

"Ukraine isn't a utopia, therefore it's a dystopia".

What?

More to the point, OPs replies were worse or non-existent. If you are going to bring up the ukraine war in a forum that is known to be on the other side of your argument you should have a better explanation than "Putin wants to revive the USSR" or at least something to back it up. Or at least engage the people trying to explain their viewpoints.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Except these replies are made to illustrate the viewpoints held by the commenters and not meant to be dunks. Rather obviously imo. Yet OP is claiming he only got called mean words and no one explained to them why they think what they think.

There absolutely were good faith explanations but OP didn't engage with any of them in kind but chose to keep replying to the dunks instead.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (11 children)

More the fact that they got detailed replies but their best counter in that whole thread where the two replies where they quickly google some shit and paste the first results and provided no thoughts of their own.

view more: ‹ prev next ›