[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Three seashells?

[-] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

/end of thread

As we used to say.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 3 months ago

Likely a lot of time was spent iterating and experimenting with different ideas, testing out concepts, tweaking, etc. Haven't played the game but I do work as a software developer.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Carmack actually developed Doom on NeXTSTEP, not Linux. The windows and DOS ports were not released as open source, due to copyright issues concerning the sound library. So they released the source of the Linux port instead. I don't think it made much of a difference in practice since it was a fairly popular game even before that.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

I still love my Xperia 5 II. I plan on keeping it for a least a couple more years.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

Dark Reader, LibRedirect, ublock origin

[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

Fedt mand, skriv gerne mere om hvordan du lagde sag an, hvis muligt.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Jeg arbejder faktisk på præcist sådan en kontrakt for tiden, altså hvor vores kode bliver reviewed af en anden leverandør. Det fungerer heldigvis fint i praksis, og er det lidt uenighed, plejer vi at finde en løsning.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Tja, jeg er langt fra ekspert, men som jeg forstår det, så er der en række udbudsregler, der skal overholdes, og nogle parametre, der skal vurderes på. Nogle gange giver Netcompany bare det bedste tilbud, og så er mand nødt til at vælge dem, selv om man ellers helst ville have haft nogle andre.

Jeg kan til gengæld undre mig over, at der stadig er så mange udviklere, der gider arbejde hos Netcompany. Men de har vist en høj udskiftning, og må være gode til også hele tiden at få nye rekrutter nye ind. Jeg bliver i hvert fald jævnligt kontaktet af deres recruiters på LinkedIn, selv om jeg aldrig svarer.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

I have to agree. It's simply not worth the risk.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Best coverage I've seen so far has been on Ars Technica.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Another vote for Debian stable with backports and flatpaks. I don't really have an issue with outdated software, and I really like "apt", maybe because I'm so used to it as this point. I've been running mainly Debian for 12+ years now.

My second choice for personal use would be Arch Linux. I had very good experience with it back in the day and their wiki is fantastic. But I'm too comfortable with the simplicity and stability of Debian at this point.

At work I use Ubuntu because everyone else uses it. It's not too bad. I just ignore all the crap I don't like (like snaps).

view more: next ›

krdo

joined 7 months ago