henfredemars

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I think this is because now the consumer knows what he or she wants. It's hard to build a mobile UI without expectations of consistency.

Back then, Android was more marching to the beat of its own drummer as it were and more dramatically crafting its design language, its visual identify.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm curious to see if this will be merely a packaged version of the web page or something more.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One wonders if dropping Play Services support is enough to motivate a user who is already sufficiently determined to use a phone this outdated.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Perhaps you were being sarcastic, but I'm very excited about this feature. I often visit rural areas, and if I got a flat I would love my phone to be useful for letting family know what's going on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If it helps, I only have a high refresh phone display. I don't notice the difference when I'm using my slower displays because I'm not used to seeing those applications at a higher refresh rate. It doesn't seem to bother my mind.

I only notice it when I'm using another phone at a lower refresh rate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Precisely this. I didn't notice it much when I started using it, but I switch between phones frequently for software development, and I definitely feel the difference. It's nice, but it's not a life-changing difference. It's just a difference.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

My dad: Unions are what's wrong with this country. I do everything I can to undermine them in the workplace.

Also my dad: They're abusing the workers! I can't even get a day off when I'm deathly ill without getting fired. Why won't anybody stand up for us?!

Don't even get me started on healthcare. He's a diabetic. You'd think it'd be a priority for him.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Short answer is no. Long answer is no. The problem is their drivers (and hardware) are very young so there's a lot of odd things games can do that hurt performance in unexpected ways.

In practice they are not as good because Intel lacks experience, but I think they're on the right track. Is it worth the money today? Probably not. The risk of coming across a game that doesn't run well is just too high.

I really wanted Intel to be a serious contender for my last GPU purchase but there were too many good, consistently performing options in that price range for it to make a lot of sense.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow! It was hardly worth it to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I appreciate the updates. Remember to take it easy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Risk management > blind security rules. The latter is security theatre.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

All refers to everything that your instance knows about. Your instance only retrieves data for which users are actually subscribed.

All can be weird on small instances if the user subscriptions don't have a nice distribution.

view more: ‹ prev next ›