Ah, I see you don't follow my (sometimes) daily musings. I chatted about the two communities from that instance appearing on this version on the Wednesday and Friday lists.
Anyway, I've eventually got around to messaging the mod of those communities, asking them to revert the community tags back to NSFW, which they have done so. Whether the lemmyverse crawler picks up on the change in time for next list is unknown, but even if not, they won't appear in the SFW lists after that.
The trailer looks very impressive. For the French, it must depict a true dystopia: a future Paris, where everyone is speaking English.
Solid 50% on RT too, as all the best films are.
no matter what new music format came out, I listened to the same 10 bands on it
Ackshually, I don't listen to Faith No More anymore. So it's the same 9 bands.
It's in OP's post - it the Mandalorian thing.
I very deliberately phrased my issue as a personal one. I didn't like a particular Community, so I found a different one (joys of the Fediverse and whatnot). I wanted you to do something (in terms of encouraging him to post from literally anywhere else), you disagreed, that was that.
Their ways are archaic
They deserve the upheaval ...
So does [email protected] to be fair.
I wouldn't normally advocate in favour of lemmy.world against a specialised instance, but [email protected] has lots of posts with a future timestamp, and it does my head in.
Direct quote from wikipedia:
Reviewers often criticize Bay's films for relying heavily on visual effects and suffering from clichéd dialogue, flimsy and formulaic narratives, numerous scientific and historical inaccuracies, illogical plot developments, and lack of character depth.[54][55][56] Bay contends that he is not discouraged by such criticism and that he aims to provide enjoyable "popcorn" entertainment to movie-going audiences.[46] Stating that he is "a filmmaker, not a scientist", he creates his own fiction based on actual science or history to make the messages he sends "more exciting".[57]
You're reframing OP's question. There's no suggestion that I'm the only one with this opportunity - I'm relying on others to plant ideas about the climate or whatever, and focusing on what maybe other people haven't already said (which is a good strategy for posting on Lemmy, incidentally).
But if that's your genuine criticism, that what I posted can't be ranked as the most important thing, well there's plenty of other posts that you should be busy responding to.
Ha, no, I didn't mean it like that. The 'role of providing semen' and the 'role of providing eggs' would be during normal intercourse.
Hear me out first.
'Gender critical' theory. Everyone should have this theory, as originally defined, planted in their head. Men would only associate 'masculinity' with their role in providing semen for procreation. Women would only associate 'femininity' with their role in providing eggs for procreation.
There would be no gender-non-conformity because there would be no ideas about gender to conform to. A minority of men would, as an everyday thing, wear dresses. It would be impossible to verify that someone was a woman or not (short of x-raying their uterus).
The important thing, is that if this happened, the people currently claiming that they're 'gender critical' would lose their freaking minds.
Searching for 'support' on your instance gave me https://lemmy.ml/c/lemmy_support.
It says it's for 'Lemmy' rather than lemmy.ml specifically, but I guess it'll be read by the right people.
I didn't have the same issues you had. Maybe a browser issue.