conciselyverbose

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

That's a loot box with extra steps. You get loot box physical trash and loot box digital trash. TCGs are the original microtransactions.

Now, the extra steps are a small barrier that makes it slightly less bad, because you have to physically go to a store or at least order and wait to get them. But it's not that much less bad.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

No they didn't.

"You have to rebuy your games, that you can't play anywhere else" isn't just "not the best way". It's straight up horseshit with no possible way to be valid. It's also the biggest reason it tanked.

The only thing about stadia that was in any way redeemable was the fact that they didn't mess around and gave full refunds for any game purchase.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

It's already proven. Repeatedly.

Nintendo and every lawyer involved should see obscene fines for the blatant harassment.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Emulation is not piracy.

There is an abundance of precedent that emulation is not copyright infringement and is not in any way illegal. You can absolutely make money on an emulator and there is absolutely nothing they can do.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago (4 children)

The courts aren't. Nintendo is.

Emulation has already been litigated to hell and back. It's very clearly legal, including relying on users pulling a blob or two from their hardware for the whole thing to function.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

By existing. (Yes, that's the only argument they made. There is no assertion that anyone associated with Yuzu "cracked" (not necessary) or actively distributed TOTK.)

It's a distraction. It's literally impossible for it to be relevant unless the yuzu project page hosted TOTK files.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (3 children)

No, it's not.

The case Sony lost also relied on the end user having a blob of Sony's code. A user using their own key and a blob of Nintendo's firmware, which is the official stance of Yuzu on the correct way to do so, is exactly the same thing. There's nothing new to be litigated. Every part of Yuzu is very clearly legal.

The fact that it was used to play a game before official release straight up cannot possibly be relevant. It's a distraction. The project isn't, and isn't capable of being, responsible for anything but its own code.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Emulation has also been litigated to hell and is also very clearly legal.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's a far cry better than Google or Amazon making you buy the game on their service specifically.

It's still cloud gaming. So it still sucks. But at least they're not trying to force you into a shitty locked in storefront. (Though not keeping your Steam login is definitely a pain point.)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There isn't guesswork involved. They know for certain that people will. They have network effect on their side. Their entire audience is captive. Anyone willing to leave already has after the hundreds of different "revelations" of how fucking disgusting everything they have ever touched is.

They aren't selling anything but your privacy. It's Apple's limitations on being overt malware that they'd be bypassing, and it is absolutely guaranteed that they would do so the literal minute they can.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yes, it would.

They don't leave the play store because, and exclusively because, Google allows them to do anything they want. Apple does not. The literally exact day a similar law goes into effect in the US, it's an absolute guarantee Facebook leaves the App Store with every single app they have. There's not even the slight possibility they stay there.

view more: ‹ prev next ›