With physics, but paused while coding. It only comes crashing down when the code gets executed.

We can add caching so numbers that have been checked once can be quickly looked up from an inMemory database.

Sounds like they are the product owner :)

Even without algorithm knowledge it should be fairly obvious that you can just fast forward several minutes and check if the item has gone missing.

Not the most efficient solution, but beats watching the entire tape in real time.

Just npm install isWeekend for the required locales.

Depends on: isMonday, isTuesday,...

Tilted 22 degree to maximize the potential line length that can be displayed.

https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20211203-ideal-monitor-rotation-for-programmers/

import codegolf
codegolf.challenge1() 

Assembly would be lower. You have more complex / direct instructions in assembly. Brain fuck is pretty much just a pure turing machine, and has 8 instructions.

X86 has ~ 1000 + variants. Even ARM with a smaller instruction set has 232 instructions.

In brain fuck to set a number you'd have to count up (or down - underflow) to that number. In assembly you just set it.

Somewhere I've read that current assembly code with Makros should be similar to writing C.

300 nested if statements, (...) added another 5000 nested if statements.

At this point I want to doubt that they actually wrote it themselves, vs writing a metaprogram to generate the code.

Creating an array of the function calls, and joining those seems more readable in that case.

Plus you don't have to take care that you use the correct number of placeholders.

That's the problem. It will confidently give you an correct sounding answer.

If it is actually true is a different topic. So don't just blindly trust it. Verify, or at least sanity check it.

The solution is obviously to replace the mods by bots, to fight other bots.

Battle bots, but virtual XD