collectifission

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

@Emil Currently 57% of all uranium globally is retrieved using ISL. This will further raise the number, further decreasing the footprint of uranium mining.

cc @dch

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

@Emil Of course, the work only just begins. Decades of dependence on Russian nuclear fuel has decimated Western industry on this. The ban makes room for Western nuclear fuel companies to exist, especially American ones. It'll take around a decade to build up this industrial infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

@icanbob
I think this has to do with the fact that:

  1. Thailand is new to nuclear energy.
  2. Seaborg is an unproven startup.
  3. This barge concept hasn't been proven in the West yet.
    @Emil
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

@Draedron
Really? Tell us more. I never ever heard these arguments before. I also never ever refuted them a thousand times already. Please, tell us, as we never heard these very original takes!
@Emil

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

@Emil “A common European market for nuclear power plants would enable the benefits of serial production, and this requires a technology-neutral climate and energy policy from the EU, as well as cooperation between nuclear safety authorities in harmonising requirements.”

This is what I'm talking about! A European cooperation like this would be great idea!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

@Emil This is a pretty big change from the EU. If anything, it's still way too timid (we need hundreds of new big units in Europe, not merely 30), but this is already a watershed moment compared to just a few years ago when nuclear was the black sheep in Brussels.

They're finally starting to get it!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

@Emil Anti-nuclear activists must be really in a bind explaining this one away.

"But isn't there smore sun in Bangladesh? But isn't solar cheaper? But but ..."

Nuclear provides dispatchable energy in a densely populated country. This is a smart choice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

@Foppe @Emil Why do you say that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

@Emil The EU is killing it lately with massive legislative steps forward ⚛️

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@KevonLooney I skipped that part because, in my opinion, it is completely irrelevant. But I do think that out of those 400,000 people receiving nuclear heat, there are bound to be party officials and other 'higher ups'.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

@KevonLooney Ok, let's assume you're not trolling and you genuinely don't know that the tertiary cooling piping has zero contact with the reactor.

The primary cooling network goes through the reactor. The secondary network powers the turbine and already has no contact with the fuel rods in the reactor. The tertiary network is then used for the district heating.

So, there is no "nuclear steam" involved.

So, let's reverse our places and hope you weren't acting you didn't understand this.

@Emil

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (5 children)
view more: ‹ prev next ›