Weerdo

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

So, that whole section for Spock on being a Vulcan, That's the video clip they're going to give new actors for Vulcans isn't it? Right down to the prosthetics.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They'll win in the end when the internet gets board like always. Still, it'll be fun to watch burn, knock some value off the IPO.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I like that the code is 451, but yeah no one is going to explicitly use it when they're blocking things. A little too on the nose.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Alright so not just me, it's useful but out of date. Some of these are still good, others have been replaced.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I have a feeling they got a massive number of those,ni am one of them as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yep. It turns out there is no such thing as a 'balanced' social network.

Which is analogous to life, depressingly enough.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've always thought about creating some metric to weight users who create comments with the most engagement as higher. That leads to the most controversial or dividing comments rising though.

Some impartial judgement via mod points and or community awards to weigh valuable users would be nice.

The issue is any of these would be gamed, it might be possible today to use an AI model like ChatGPT but that's got its own biases.

So for the moment I can't think of a better system than upvote downvote.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Still need that alert function on the app.

Although all this immature development is making me consider taking a stab at programming Social Networks again. Last effort was an app back in College to collate facebook, twitter, reddit, etc into one interface. Very clunky, held together by proverbial tape and crashed when there were non latin characters input. Still, that was fun.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Well, it's the nature of almost any online community. Say the 'popular' thing and you're lauded, even if a slightly less popular point is more valid / has better evidence.

There really is no good way to discourage this other than fostering a community which values the discourse over 'popular' thing. That's difficult to do even offline.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm, I don't disagree with the fragmentation but that's the nature of any new social platform. It's also been proven out that eventually one or two communities for a topic will become the dominant one with the others falling into disuse.

Attempting to merge communities early or artificially will cause moderator strife as minor disagreements balloon. Especially in a multireddit community where no one mod(team) has absolute control.

I don't have a reason from a technical point of view, but from a social one. Forcing communities and instances together early will only cause strife. After a few years where two communities have a track record and proven 'behavior' would the multireddit not cause issue.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Personally a Reddit is Fun user, but sad to see them all go...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Feels like old school forums again. A little barebones compared to some of the corporate stuff, but that's not a bad thing. Just the simple what's needed no extra fluff.

view more: next β€Ί