Reported. For bad.
It also just doesn't make sense.
"I knew what my friend was about to say before she said it" – intuitive judgement (from sense-data) is a good explanation
"People guess which of 4 random people are phoning them 40% of the time in a telephone telepathy experiment" – intuitive judgement (from sense-data) makes no sense as an explanation
I've seen old youtube videos saved on ghostarchive, but I'm not sure how extensively it covers it.
I haven't even posted the good stuff
That one guy said no evidence had been published and he would retract his statement if I posted any, so I posted the first three I found and he retracted. Aprt from that I've posted two links about the CIA report. That's it.
your position is unequivocally false
It's a question of evidence. We'll know that from the evidence
Thr ganzfeld procedure seems to be the main replicable one, at least 40 replications.
https://archive.org/details/ReplicationandMetaanalysisinParapsychology
The US government has put serious money into this stuff, and the most they got out of it was "you can give somebody a mental illness by randomly drugging them."
Actually here's the main report they issued. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00791R000200180005-5.pdf
I don't agree with your characterisation that they concluded "you can give somebody a mental illness by randomly drugging them"; they concluded "A statistically significant laboratory effect has been demonstrated in the sense that hits occur more often than chance."
are they in the room with us?
Good comment tbh, though I certainly haven't shared a "wealth of research".
Skepticism also has a lot of weird grifters and scammers like Randi
fitgirl-repacks dot site/satellite-reign-v1-02
Saw your post and replied from hexbear.cum