His supporters don't see these clips or read the transcript. Fox, OANN, etc, never show his disasters.
Someonelemmy
Even more ironic, he said no one would be swayed by an out of touch billionaire that can't identify with them...
Apparently its the other way around. This tech is old: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jul/19/robots-research
News to me. I loved the game andI really thought the plot was original.
Well now I just D.A.R.E. the cops to stay off drugs. Just say "no", you hypocritical bastards
That's encouraging. Just when I thought nothing would come of the protests. Now to see if the vote actually pass a motion to divest.
Ok. So, replace him with who?
I'm not so sure SCOTUS would rule that way. Even Gorsuch ruled in favor of lgbtq rights because it is such obvious discrimination: https://www.npr.org/2020/06/15/863498848/supreme-court-delivers-major-victory-to-lgbtq-employees#:~:text=Gorsuch%20couched%20his%20opinion%20in,or%20transgender%20without%20discriminating%20...
Hillary couldn't win using the "Trump is dangerous" platform, but she's absolutely been proven right. The question now is, do enough people care about something as existential as the end of democracy, or are they too focused on inflation and gas prices.
The court cases striking down these shitty laws really need to get moving. Restricting access to hormone therapy is blatantly unconstitutional, as the existing challenges that have made it through the courts have proved.
People born XXY (Klinefelter's Syndrome) can get testosterone for treatment, so to say someone who needs testosterone for similar gender affirming care cannot get it is plain discrimination on the basis of gender and sexual orientation.
Precedents.
But your typo still kinda works....
"Internet Brands did not respond to a request for comment, except to say that people were busy with meetings. "
Well there's your problem.... Probably having meetings about how they need more meetings.
Drugs are great, too!