[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

If i mostly use CTs/LXCs the impact should be minimal (in theory), maybe even better if i dont have everything powerd up.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

That's interesting, haven't considered that. Although I would want to run most things in CTs/LXCs and not full VMs for performance reasons. And Proxmox has more DIY feel which i kind of like. If I fail with Proxmox, might give QubesOS a try.

6
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I am trying to install and setup proxmox on laptop and use it as daily driver. I want to make network setup that can use both ethernet and WiFi, whichever is available and i want VMs to be able to access LAN because some things dont work otherwise (like NDI). I have writen config file that makes 2 bridges and every VM would have 2 interfaces. I havent installed Proxmox yet because i dont want to mess things up (it wouldn't be first time :) ). My question is does this config look ok and are there some recomendations.

/etc/network/interfaces

auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

# Ethernet interface
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet manual

# WiFi interface
auto wlan0
iface wlan0 inet manual

# Ethernet bridge
auto vmbr0
iface vmbr0 inet dhcp
    bridge_ports eth0
    bridge_stp off
    bridge_fd 0

# WiFi bridge
auto vmbr1
iface vmbr1 inet dhcp
    bridge_ports wlan0
    bridge_stp off
    bridge_fd 0
5
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I am trying to install and setup proxmox on laptop and use it as daily driver. I want to make network setup that can use both ethernet and WiFi, whichever is available and i want VMs to be able to access LAN because some things dont work otherwise (like NDI). I have writen config file that makes 2 bridges and every VM would have 2 interfaces. I havent installed Proxmox yet because i dont want to mess things up (it wouldn't be first time :) ). My question is does this config look ok and are there some recomendations.

/etc/network/interfaces

auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

# Ethernet interface
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet manual

# WiFi interface
auto wlan0
iface wlan0 inet manual

# Ethernet bridge
auto vmbr0
iface vmbr0 inet dhcp
    bridge_ports eth0
    bridge_stp off
    bridge_fd 0

# WiFi bridge
auto vmbr1
iface vmbr1 inet dhcp
    bridge_ports wlan0
    bridge_stp off
    bridge_fd 0
[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

its wierd that it is compared by CO2/mass, it would make more sense per callories or some important nutrients.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I think he meant relative cost (including time)

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Sure, they are not perfectly stable, there is always inflation (sometimes more, sometimes less).

But its not as volatile as crypto. In last 24h difference between monero high an low is ~2% (which isnt terrible by itself but on a longer period its larger difference) and regular currency effectively has almost no volatility in 24h period.

Acording to google 1 year inflation was ~3.4% for dollar. (so probably diff hig low is just a bit higher) Difference between monero 1 year low an high was greater than 20%. So monero is something like 6 times more volatile. (and i am not talking about inflation, but volatility)

So its not exactly the same situation regarding stability.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

But that only guarantees safe one way transaction. If that is all you want thats ok.

But for safer transaction you want something like smart contracts. So you can actualy know you are gonna get what you buy for example.

Without some kind of smart contracts you are actualy relying on exchanges (so in reality it isn't really trustless).

Does monero have some kind of smart contract mechanism? In which case I am talking nonsense😂.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I dont understand what service you would give or get from that.

Something like filecoin, you can provide storage or buy storage without need for some external exchange. Because it is basically "baked in" the crypto (or should be, i am not completely sure it works that way).

[-] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I was thinking it would be hard to store that amount of data in QR code even if image quality was reduced.

My cousin had an idea to make (print) an album but wanted to do it with QR codes because it would be cheaper to print (only black and white printing is required).

-7
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Is there some app that takes multiple images and generates QR code, and of course that it can also do reverse so you can scan QR code and view images.

QR code should contain images, not link to images.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago

It specifies which employers are cover with the WARN act, not employees. It either covers whole company (all employees in company) or no one at company at all.

16
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The benchmark with 1B rows in this blogpost seems irrelevant for comparing performance of different programming languages.

It seems like the execution time of a program would be dominated by loading data from the file. And a lot of people posted solution with specs of cpu but not specs of disk (hdd, ssd, raid) although that seems more relevant.

Why would they compare languages and solutions in this way?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

..ahh, you gotta love that head bashing. It definitely helps if you're masochist.😂

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You definitely shouldn't overprovision cores (logical cores, 16 in your case), especially for gamming VM. Because you are not going to get more performance, you are only going to increase overhead of context switching. One way to "pin" VM to half of cores is to give your VM 8 vCPU and increase vCPU units value (default is 1000). vCPU units determines VM priority in case of more work than CPU can handle.

https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/cpu-units.1047/

Basicaly if you have 2 VMs with default value of 1000 and CPU can't handle everything, proxmox will give both VMs equal cpu time (50/50).

But if for example you give first VM 3000 vCPU units, then under heavy load CPU time will be divided 75/25.

Time on CPU will be proportional to given vCPU units (under load).

So if you want to "pin" VM to 8 logical cores, then give VM 8 vCPUs and increase vCPU units (depending how big of priority you want).

view more: next ›

RealBot

joined 1 year ago