Railing5132

I completely agree with your last two paragraphs. Regarding the rest, the other person that replied stated my thoughts in much more eloquent terms than I'm able at present.

Edit: regarding the electoral and electorate math: I noticed you didn't touch the "Trump working the Netenyahu to block a ceasefire" (which would obliviate the need for bombs), "you can't govern if you can't win", and "AIPAC" topics, but also seem to think that all of this is Harris' fault or she has control of this.

That'll teach her! Way to go - you really stuck it to that horrible excuse of a candidate.

It's not like she had better labor policies (or practices) than that other guy (or did she?)

It's not like that other guy was (allegedly) working with an (alleged) war criminal to rebuff US efforts to make a ceasefire deal (or was he?)

And finally, it's not like AIPAC can literally thumbs up or down damn near any politician in the US like Julius H. Fucking, Ceasar and an almost universal bloc of voters will carry out their direction. Oh, wait, they will.

The thing that pisses me off is that yeah, maybe she's fine in Cali or Hawaii or wherever. But there's gonna be a fuck of a lot more death and misery in the world if fascists get control of the United States in the form of Donald Trump, and in those few states that matter (because of the fucked up electoral college) that attitude , which I perceive as smug self-righteousness, could be the deciding factor.

That simple worldview, unburdened with the whole idea of "you can't make change if you're not elected" must really be comfortable.

But you sure showed Harris.

I'd love to expound on this thought, but I have a fussy infant daughter that needs attending. BTW, it would be really cool if she FUCKING DIDN'T have to grow up in some goddamned Handmaid's Tale dystopia.

Yeah, but then we get Vance, who is worse.

This will be my third time as an election official. I'm "just" in my early 50s and am the kid in the room that's good with computers. A younger generation of poll workers is desperately needed. I have to use a vacation day to do it, but am glad I have that ability.

Didn't know that. I sit corrected.

Unless something has changed, "1:4 meat" comes shipped frozen in big boxes just like "1:10 meat". I don't think I've ever seen fresh not frozen burger at a McDonald's.

Sir, this isn't a Wendy's :D

I don't lift a damn thing and regularly swipe spoonfuls of peanut butter.

I want to believe, but I just don't see it happening. I live in a swing state rural area and I've seen easily 3-4x more trump signs in yards than I have in elections previous, and I'm livid.

That old white lady was the actress who played June Cleaver of "Leave It To Beaver" - a 50s(?) b&w white-bread conservative-family-values-americana TV show

That was the biggest part of the gag.

I'd like to see that source. The voter information should be limited to their registered address and what primary or caucus they voted in - not their individual votes, which are anonymized. At most, a PAC should only be able to infer (from the voter information alone) a likelihood of which political party the voter is associated with. Now, if they take that voters info and combine it with open source intelligence, social media, advertising intelligence/marketing data, they can make much better assumptions.

At the locality level, the voter is issued a serialized ballot. The local township, city, whatever keeps a log that "voter x received ballot Y", but that's where the association ends. Before being tabulated (read by the optical scanning machine and dropped into a sealed chamber), an election official removes to perforated strip containing the serial number, and the voter deposits the ballot (deserialized) into the tabulator. There is no input to the tabulator to indicate which ballot, or which voter was just processed.

The registration receipts and ballots (without serial numbers) are kept by the locality under seal for a designated retention period.

Source: local election official

At least Lecter is honest about who he is!

I'm probably gonna mess this quote up, but I thought it was brilliant:

"Privacy is essential to security, and shitty people feel entitled to take that away from you."

You can't be secure in your dealings or operate on equal footing (economically speaking, as others here have pointed out) without a measure of privacy.