PullUpCircuit

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

I didn't see that. I got Oops All Asians when generating gay furry Nazis on Bing.

To answer further questions, it was in response to a post about how Russians are said to view Ukrainian.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I wish there was dognip

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

That's really what I'm expecting. My guess is that the training data is skewed, and the prompt cannot adjust.

Either the machine will need to understand what is expected, or the company will need to address this and allow people to enable or disable diversity.

The first option may be impossible to attain at this stage. The second can lead to inappropriate images.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Maybe not an alternative site, but an alternative perspective. Instead of looking at all items on lemmy, try finding and subscribing to communities that pique your interest, then viewing by subscribed communities.

I know it's not what you were specifically asking for, and it's a little more work than just sliding into another site, but it will give you the opportunity to weed out information you are not interested in.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Pretty sure these tools are often seeded with prompts that enforce diversity. Bing does the same or similar. I'm more amused by this, as the process isn't aware and can't actively enable or disable these settings.

To actively fit a historical prompt, it would need to not only consider images from the period, but also properly synthesize historical data to go with the prompt.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

My dampness sensors went south a long time ago. Cleaned the whole thing out and everything. I'm also at least the second owner. The contacts in the load selection knob also had worn away from use and I had to repair them. I'll be happy to get another three to five years out of it.

I just use the timed dry now and send slightly smaller loads through. It's much more efficient.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

That's an estimated equivalent 39 billion US dollars drop in revenue from about 300 billion.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Which is the propaganda? The posts touting Chinese achievements in tech, or the posts saying to beware of the Chinese milestones?

Both.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't this mean that overwhelming non factual information would skew the results of chat gpt?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I would use a damp wrung-out rag with just a tiny bit of soap in it too wipe it down. I might come back with clean water, still wrung-out.

Wooden toothpicks are great for the cracks because they are softer than the plastic.

I would save the IPA on a swab for any electric contacts, assuming you have removed batteries. If you can't remove the batteries, I would wait until you are having physical connection issues or have spilled something on it.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago

That's from Draggin Ballz

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Fair question, as I have asked the same as others. I have had a long time to grow comfortable with myself. I have only had passing interest in the other side, and I would only be sad to no longer be myself.

 
 
72
Kill Bert (iusearchlinux.fyi)
 

Miss Piggy as Ellie Driver in Kill Bill in a white nurses outfit and eye patch walking down the hall with a syringe on a tray

 

 

My question in FOSS is whether, or how the license applies, if anyone can clarify it for me. I'm not going into a legal battle, I just am having issues rectifying the licensing with my expectations.

Also, ia most FOSS is written this way, with an expectation that organizations have to pay for licensing to use the software?

The issue below is for AGPL and PDFCreator. AGPL, if I read it correctly, seems to restrict restrictions on the license.

I work as MSP for an entity who uses PDFCreator, quite possibly based on a previous license.

I can't otherwise explain the use or make changes myself, other than it is used as a PDF printer on user desktops to create digital documents.

What I can say is that we had recently attempted to automate the process of installing it with new computers. We ran into a minor hiccup and contacted their support for assistance. The response was that the program is not intended for free use in a corporate environment and that we will need to purchase licenses.

While I take issue with their determination and restriction of the use, it is their software and they make the rules. I'm not sure if they are violating the GPL, but I'd like some understanding if anything has a different interpretation.

We will most likely just use the built in PDF creator. A loss for the FOSS footprint, but not something I can control.

view more: next ›